Re: io_uring process termination/killing is not working

Pavel Begunkov
2020-08-17T10:18:31Z

On 16/08/2020 18:22, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 8/16/20 7:53 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 8/16/20 6:45 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 8/15/20 9:48 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>> On 15/08/2020 18:12, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>> On 8/15/20 12:45 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>>>> On 13/08/2020 02:32, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/12/20 12:28 PM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2020 21:22, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2020 21:20, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/08/2020 21:05, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 8/12/20 11:58 AM, Josef wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a weird issue on kernel 5.8.0/5.8.1, SIGINT even SIGKILL
>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work to kill this process(always state D or D+), literally I
>>>>>>>>>>>> have to terminate my VM because even the kernel can't kill the process
>>>>>>>>>>>> and no issue on 5.7.12-201, however if IOSQE_IO_LINK is not set, it
>>>>>>>>>>>> works
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I've attached a file to reproduce it
>>>>>>>>>>>> or here
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://gist.github.com/1Jo1/15cb3c63439d0c08e3589cfa98418b2c
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks, I'll take a look at this. It's stuck in uninterruptible
>>>>>>>>>>> state, which is why you can't kill it.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It looks like one of the hangs I've been talking about a few days ago,
>>>>>>>>>> an accept is inflight but can't be found by cancel_files() because it's
>>>>>>>>>> in a link.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, I described it a month ago, there were more details.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/34eb5e5a-8d37-0cae-be6c-c6ac4d85b5d4@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah I think you're right. How about something like the below? That'll
>>>>>>> potentially cancel more than just the one we're looking for, but seems
>>>>>>> kind of silly to only cancel from the file table holding request and to
>>>>>>> the end.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The bug is not poll/t-out related, IIRC my test reproduces it with
>>>>>> read(pipe)->open(). See the previously sent link.
>>>>>
>>>>> Right, but in this context for poll, I just mean any request that has a
>>>>> poll handler armed. Not necessarily only a pure poll. The patch should
>>>>> fix your case, too.
>>>>
>>>> Ok. I was thinking about sleeping in io_read(), etc. from io-wq context.
>>>> That should have the same effect.
>>>
>>> We already cancel any blocking work for the exiting task - but we do
>>> that _after_ trying to cancel files, so we should probably just swap
>>> those around in io_uring_flush(). That'll remove any need to find and
>>> cancel those explicitly in io_uring_cancel_files().
>>
>> I guess there's still the case of the task just closing the fd, not
>> necessarily exiting. So I do agree with you that the io-wq case is still
>> unhandled. I'll take a look...

Right. It should be in the cancel code itself.
Thanks for dealing with this. It seems, you had a busy week with all
these syzkaller reports.

>
> The below should do it.
>
>
> diff --git a/fs/io_uring.c b/fs/io_uring.c
> index dc506b75659c..346a3eb84785 100644
> --- a/fs/io_uring.c
> +++ b/fs/io_uring.c
> @@ -8063,6 +8063,33 @@ static bool io_timeout_remove_link(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> return found;
> }
>
> +static bool io_cancel_link_cb(struct io_wq_work *work, void *data)
> +{
> + return io_match_link(container_of(work, struct io_kiocb, work), data);
> +}
> +
> +static void io_attempt_cancel(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_kiocb *req)
> +{
> + enum io_wq_cancel cret;
> +
> + /* cancel this particular work, if it's running */
> + cret = io_wq_cancel_work(ctx->io_wq, &req->work);
> + if (cret != IO_WQ_CANCEL_NOTFOUND)
> + return;
> +
> + /* find links that hold this pending, cancel those */
> + cret = io_wq_cancel_cb(ctx->io_wq, io_cancel_link_cb, req, true);
> + if (cret != IO_WQ_CANCEL_NOTFOUND)
> + return;
> +
> + /* if we have a poll link holding this pending, cancel that */
> + if (io_poll_remove_link(ctx, req))
> + return;
> +
> + /* final option, timeout link is holding this req pending */
> + io_timeout_remove_link(ctx, req);
> +}
> +
> static void io_uring_cancel_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> struct files_struct *files)
> {
> @@ -8116,10 +8143,8 @@ static void io_uring_cancel_files(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
> continue;
> }
> } else {
> - io_wq_cancel_work(ctx->io_wq, &cancel_req->work);
> - /* could be a link, check and remove if it is */
> - if (!io_poll_remove_link(ctx, cancel_req))
> - io_timeout_remove_link(ctx, cancel_req);
> + /* cancel this request, or head link requests */
> + io_attempt_cancel(ctx, cancel_req);
> io_put_req(cancel_req);
> }
>
>

--
Pavel Begunkov