From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
Linux-Audit Mailing List <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
io-uring@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
Steve Grubb <sgrubb@redhat.com>, Stefan Roesch <shr@fb.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 10:40:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da695bf4-bd9b-a03d-3fbc-686724a7b602@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1674682056.git.rgb@redhat.com>
On 1/27/23 10:23 AM, Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
> A couple of updates to the iouring ops audit bypass selections suggested in
> consultation with Steve Grubb.
>
> Richard Guy Briggs (2):
> io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE
> io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR
>
> io_uring/opdef.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Look fine to me - we should probably add stable to both of them, just
to keep things consistent across releases. I can queue them up for 6.3.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-27 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-27 17:23 [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 17:23 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] io_uring,audit: audit IORING_OP_FADVISE but not IORING_OP_MADVISE Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 22:35 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 22:45 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 22:57 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-28 16:48 ` Steve Grubb
2023-01-27 23:02 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 23:03 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 23:08 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 22:55 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 23:05 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 17:23 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] io_uring,audit: do not log IORING_OP_*GETXATTR Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 22:43 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 23:01 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 23:05 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-28 0:07 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-28 0:06 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-28 0:19 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-28 17:26 ` Steve Grubb
2023-01-29 23:37 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 17:40 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2023-01-27 19:42 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] two suggested iouring op audit updates Paul Moore
2023-01-27 19:43 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 22:38 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 22:46 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 22:53 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 23:02 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-27 23:07 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2023-01-27 23:08 ` Paul Moore
2023-01-27 23:10 ` Jens Axboe
2023-01-28 16:47 ` Steve Grubb
2023-01-28 17:03 ` Paul Moore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da695bf4-bd9b-a03d-3fbc-686724a7b602@kernel.dk \
--to=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
--cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=rgb@redhat.com \
--cc=sgrubb@redhat.com \
--cc=shr@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox