Linux io-uring development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Kanchan Joshi <joshi.k@samsung.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Anuj Gupta <anuj20.g@samsung.com>,
	axboe@kernel.dk, kbusch@kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	asml.silence@gmail.com, krisman@suse.de,
	io-uring@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 23:16:53 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1plpsauu5.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe85a641-c974-3fa7-43f1-eacbb7834210@samsung.com> (Kanchan Joshi's message of "Wed, 28 Aug 2024 19:12:22 +0530")


Kanchan,

> With Guard/Reftag/Apptag, we get 6 combinations. For NVMe, all can be
> valid. For SCSI, maximum 4 can be valid. And we factor the pi-type in
> while listing what all is valid. For example: 010 or 001 is not valid
> for SCSI and should not be shown by this.

I thought we had tentatively agreed to let the block layer integrity
flags only describe what the controller should do? And then let sd.c
decide what to do about RDPROTECT/WRPROTECT (since host-to-target is a
different protection envelope anyway). That is kind of how it works
already.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-29  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CGME20240823104552epcas5p226dbbbd448cd0ee0955ffdd3ad1b112d@epcas5p2.samsung.com>
2024-08-23 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Read/Write with meta/integrity Anuj Gupta
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 01/10] block: define set of integrity flags to be inherited by cloned bip Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29  3:05     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 02/10] block: introduce a helper to determine metadata bytes from data iter Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:24     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29  3:06     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 03/10] block: handle split correctly for user meta bounce buffer Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-28 11:18       ` Anuj Gupta
2024-08-29  4:04         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 04/10] block: modify bio_integrity_map_user to accept iov_iter as argument Anuj Gupta
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 05/10] block: define meta io descriptor Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:31     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29  3:05     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 06/10] io_uring/rw: add support to send meta along with read/write Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:33     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 07/10] block: introduce BIP_CHECK_GUARD/REFTAG/APPTAG bip_flags Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:35     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-28 13:42       ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-08-29  3:16         ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2024-08-29  4:06           ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29 13:29           ` Anuj gupta
2024-09-12 12:40             ` Anuj Gupta
2024-09-13  2:06             ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-29  4:06         ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 07/10] block,nvme: " Anuj Gupta
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 08/10] block: add support to pass user meta buffer Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:44     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 09/10] nvme: add handling for app_tag Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:49     ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-08-29  3:00     ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-29 10:18       ` Kanchan Joshi
2024-09-13  2:05         ` Martin K. Petersen
2024-08-23 10:38   ` [PATCH v3 10/10] scsi: add support for user-meta interface Anuj Gupta
2024-08-24  8:52     ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq1plpsauu5.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
    --to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=anuj20.g@samsung.com \
    --cc=asml.silence@gmail.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=gost.dev@samsung.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=io-uring@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joshi.k@samsung.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=krisman@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox