From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: iwd@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] scan: refactor start_next_scan_request to not send duplicate requests
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2020 15:10:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45a9172a-3bcf-eee5-dcfd-a53bd4bd2e7e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c5c3d21d-8145-9ddd-afc6-701aa5fa7634@bang-olufsen.dk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1997 bytes --]
Hi Alvin,
> I traced the following events leading to a duplicate scan request being sent.
> The scenario assumes that the scan request queue is empty in the beginning.
>
>
> station_enter_state: disconnected -> autoconnect_quick
> -> station_quick_scan_trigger
> -> station_scan_trigger: notify cb = station_quick_scan_results
> -> scan_passive
> -> scan_common
> -> scan_request_send_trigger
> -> l_queue_push_tail: scan request queue size = 1
> scan_notify: quick scan triggered
> network_connect: requested over dbus
> -> network_connect_psk
> -> station_connect_network
> -> station_enter_state: autoconnect_quick -> connecting
> -> periodic_scan_stop
> -> scan_periodic_stop
> -> scan_cancel
> scan_notify: quick scan aborted
> -> scan_finished
> -> l_queue_remove: scan request queue size = 0
> -> station_quick_scan_results: quick scan's notify callback
> . -> station_enter_state: connecting -> autoconnect_full
Aha, so this is the real culprit. I fixed this as well in commit
532f6b154e03b5fa222502098b5688a1784cc4e3.
> . -> scan_periodic_start
> . -> scan_periodic_queue
> . -> scan_{active_full,passive}: idk which; doesn't matter
> . -> scan_common
> . -> scan_request_send_trigger
> . -> l_queue_push_tail: scan request queue size = 1
Okay, so we start a periodic scan and in scan_finished call
start_next_scan_request again.
> -> start_next_scan_request: head of queue has already been sent
> -> scan_request_send_trigger: send it again
>
>
And since we don't check that one is already going, we issue the trigger again.
Makes sense to me now. Much appreciated.
Regards,
-Denis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-09 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 17:11 [PATCH v2 1/2] scan: refactor start_next_scan_request to not send duplicate requests Alvin =?unknown-8bit?q?=C5=A0ipraga?=
2020-06-01 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scan: refactor scan_common to not scan while scanning is suspended Alvin =?unknown-8bit?q?=C5=A0ipraga?=
2020-06-04 18:19 ` Denis Kenzior
2020-06-02 8:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] scan: refactor start_next_scan_request to not send duplicate requests Andrew Zaborowski
2020-06-04 18:31 ` Denis Kenzior
2020-06-06 17:33 ` Alvin =?unknown-8bit?q?=C5=A0ipraga?=
2020-06-09 11:49 ` Alvin =?unknown-8bit?q?=C5=A0ipraga?=
2020-06-09 20:10 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45a9172a-3bcf-eee5-dcfd-a53bd4bd2e7e@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=iwd@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox