From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ot1-f54.google.com (mail-ot1-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5CF7E2 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 02:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="LOC5kOOU" Received: by mail-ot1-f54.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6ce2c5b2154so3341172a34.3 for ; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 19:46:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698201990; x=1698806790; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ygImXl3vrd4ovJy5frR8HNP93q6p7QtiCJXwpBgNeoQ=; b=LOC5kOOUwcg2jZ7bu7K3mNryfM7dqnk9mh2WC+XkDVaNPPq0LNH9FMT5zze8YaGtwq gsJ8ifAhhvqUtxa2QnyHKbOTN1zg0qaDcKFzBtPzjP3zdU0teE2pLdm0vevRLcf/NSOC VxcPdtOF8IqqnQqpVdqqNTx3NKRC5X70oxtJDZ+M2dQoH5O7BpgHM4NZaDSuuYaFMLPi xzeLQ/t+LTDAnn1k3fiQaVcTjWePZx+Sh95vIA3pfycrz9a8bcgXVKwjgkq1PFE51r+B I6TOWD+l0GZPOYPyfDemwMmbm4gruTI6Q7U8+LsEHe8xUYBRysOQ8rZe8aofbodrvPfa w1rw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698201990; x=1698806790; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ygImXl3vrd4ovJy5frR8HNP93q6p7QtiCJXwpBgNeoQ=; b=vP5NxmwhIeO5hU2A3HjO3W23LE9IXUAAaSqTb2kOCZtKTydKpX/LkET/W+wSzeCjCr sgw81CPyJyYILnj7xIZ6RB6cNmjtiMJl3aoUPxx2mhk+gDB0K3dWk6zrIEltgQWGC2HI by5MYOdvO401XUrvl6m5rkDxt/kLLlDh/dIRrjapMZeWChC14ECmKdd7YgXInS7Y1IFG ocbghhB0/g7y8vrk4bMqBOB6XOch+omyfQ4kyqi76hXGYSLJDlJM8XK1rNqUzaf6OmdY R2jK1lBt5ucnRDCrWGxaQQDfNsSwLdN3V/I2L1s01HYT9KoDBGTrNU89rr6jpNBaYTRe oA6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YznCwV8bkUZjdHEJXy1S/7nin4PFIONSargFXudaIJQqREWcZ8z 1dFab2VMxVCbIQGf/tf541Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHHoZ5AEaprq6yDpzfQcqV+ad3qYiveGQx+lFoPkvmtjbLqUYgD3lmNxECiFT/hdC8WQMRpsA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3d09:b0:6bd:78a:460 with SMTP id eu9-20020a0568303d0900b006bd078a0460mr15071691otb.32.1698201989836; Tue, 24 Oct 2023 19:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.49.130] (cpe-70-114-247-242.austin.res.rr.com. [70.114.247.242]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id ba2-20020a056830460200b006ce2ac5daf8sm2086428otb.57.2023.10.24.19.46.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 24 Oct 2023 19:46:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5b9d6eb4-930f-4aa4-b117-5c51e4889ce7@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 21:46:28 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: iwd@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/21] doc: PKEX support for DPP Content-Language: en-US To: James Prestwood , iwd@lists.linux.dev References: <20231012200150.338401-1-prestwoj@gmail.com> <20231012200150.338401-12-prestwoj@gmail.com> <41078822-99da-466e-b612-91a8c223dbde@gmail.com> <0dd4a4a5-95aa-49c1-be77-e640862c3f82@gmail.com> <62d0c420-3bc5-45a8-80c6-c4c59db7ae2c@gmail.com> <035c5cb1-d5be-4c4b-a6f5-8c0941926225@gmail.com> <7de9faab-5863-48f5-8de6-28e1b543d2b8@gmail.com> <05ce203b-78ed-4032-9d35-e5ef43dc6397@gmail.com> From: Denis Kenzior In-Reply-To: <05ce203b-78ed-4032-9d35-e5ef43dc6397@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi James, > I'd prefer to support this because it allows a unique exchange per-device > (assuming each device sends a unique ID). Obviously, also support the human > case, maybe two configure APIs? > > ConfigureEnrollee(code, identifier) > (Though we have to make the identifier optional, either via a{sv} or an empty > string) There's nothing stopping us from having two methods on the introspection, one with a single argument and one with two. But if you want to use a dictionary, instead, that's also fine. > > StartConfigurator(object agent_path) > So pretty much what I proposed. Sounds like we are ready for another (more formal) API proposal. Regards, -Denis