From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz@gmail.com>
To: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>,
Simonas Kazlauskas <iwd.lists.linux.dev@kazlauskas.me>,
iwd@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Is the data rate estimation for 5GHz channels overly pessimistic?
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2023 12:36:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ff58310-c5ee-4694-821a-0c802cdedb89@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5780e1b2-8956-46bb-8116-b513cc564cea@gmail.com>
Hi James,
>>
>> RSSI -78 dBm
>> AverageRSSI -79 dBm
>> RxMode 802.11ax
>> RxMCS 8
>> TxMode 802.11ax
>> TxMCS 4
>> TxBitrate 206400 Kbit/s
>> RxBitrate 206500 Kbit/s
>
> This is probably because IWD doesn't take into account any of the newer 802.11ax
> IEs when estimating the data rate. So its estimation is based on VHT and not the
> newest EHT rates.
We should support HE rates just fine. Just look at the unit tests in
test-band.c. Probably need an iwmon log of the AP IEs and local capabilities to
see why the estimate is lower than what happens in practice.
What hardware is being used here?
Regards,
-Denis
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-14 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-14 9:23 Is the data rate estimation for 5GHz channels overly pessimistic? Simonas Kazlauskas
2023-10-14 16:02 ` James Prestwood
2023-10-14 17:36 ` Denis Kenzior [this message]
2023-10-14 17:45 ` Simonas Kazlauskas
2023-10-14 18:07 ` Denis Kenzior
2023-10-15 19:40 ` Simonas Kazlauskas
2023-10-16 11:35 ` James Prestwood
2023-10-16 12:38 ` James Prestwood
2023-10-16 19:12 ` Denis Kenzior
2023-10-16 20:20 ` Simonas Kazlauskas
2023-10-21 23:23 ` Simonas Kazlauskas
2023-10-22 20:14 ` Denis Kenzior
2023-10-24 12:32 ` James Prestwood
2023-10-24 14:26 ` Denis Kenzior
2023-10-24 15:06 ` James Prestwood
2023-10-24 15:32 ` Denis Kenzior
2023-10-24 15:40 ` James Prestwood
2023-10-24 15:19 ` Simonas Kazlauskas
2023-10-24 15:29 ` Denis Kenzior
2023-10-16 18:36 ` Denis Kenzior
2023-10-14 17:42 ` Simonas Kazlauskas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5ff58310-c5ee-4694-821a-0c802cdedb89@gmail.com \
--to=denkenz@gmail.com \
--cc=iwd.lists.linux.dev@kazlauskas.me \
--cc=iwd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=prestwoj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox