public inbox for iwd@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denis Kenzior <denkenz at gmail.com>
To: iwd at lists.01.org
Subject: Re: iwd configure location and files
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:42:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4e82a5c-5ab2-7f32-e54e-a5cb04877766@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CAA=hcWTGQ4+9Vm+Srog0KtQ85R2-o61WT0uPjw+GwB=G9mrXMg@mail.gmail.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1844 bytes --]

Hi Jupiter,

On 12/12/21 10:39 PM, Jupiter wrote:
> Thanks all for your advice.
> 
> Further debugging it, it seems failing DHCP was caused by an error of
> Deauthentication even, not clear if the iwd error caused mwifiex
> disconnected from WiFi modem or the mwifiex cause iwd fall:

You probably need to share full logs.  From what I remember from your previous 
logs, iwd was connecting successfully to the AP but DHCP client was not able to 
start.  I think you need to determine why that happens.  I suspect an strace or 
additional logging will be required on your system.  Perhaps permissions are not 
setup correctly?

<snip>

> Aug 04 15:26:03 solar iwd[345]: Received Deauthentication event,
> reason: 2, from_ap: true

That just means the AP has deauthenticated us.  This may be because we're not 
able to 4-Way handshake properly, or because we aren't requesting a DHCP 
address, or any other reason.

> I followed the document to enable all CRYPTO setup so I don't think it
> is a CRYPTO configured issue in the kernel.
> 

iwd would refuse to start if these options are not present.  So this is most 
likely not the culprit.

> Also searching the Internet to find someone added
> ControlPortOverNL80211=False to resolve that issue on kernel 5.9.2,
> but it did not work on my kernel 5.10.59:
> 
> # cat /etc/iwd/main.conf
> [General]
> EnableNetworkConfiguration=True
> ControlPortOverNL80211=False

If EnableNetworkConfiguration is set to False, does iwctl show you as 
successfully connected?

> 
> The other issue is the error from_ap, but I am connecting to a home
> WiFi modem, it should use a station, not ap, right? Or doesn't matter?

No, this is fine.  The message just states that AP was the initiator of the 
disconnect and not the local (iwd) device.

Regards,
-Denis

             reply	other threads:[~2021-12-14 20:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-14 20:42 Denis Kenzior [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-13  4:39 iwd configure location and files Jupiter
2021-12-02 15:47 Daniel Wagner
2021-12-01  9:24 Jupiter
2021-11-30 23:53 Denis Kenzior
2021-11-30 23:25 Jupiter
2021-11-30 22:51 Jupiter
2021-11-30 22:46 James Prestwood
2021-11-30 22:42 Denis Kenzior
2021-11-30 22:38 Jupiter
2021-11-30 22:36 KeithG
2021-11-30 22:01 Denis Kenzior
2021-11-30 21:40 James Prestwood
2021-11-30 21:29 Jupiter
2021-11-30 20:52 James Prestwood
2021-11-30 20:45 Jupiter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b4e82a5c-5ab2-7f32-e54e-a5cb04877766@gmail.com \
    --to=iwd@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox