From: Joao Marcos Costa <joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com>
To: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>, iwd@lists.linux.dev
Cc: gregory.clement@bootlin.com, Salahaldeen.Altous@leica-camera.com
Subject: Re: Iwd: unable to start AP with NXP 88W9098 chipset
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 15:28:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <edd63888-bf1f-440f-98d1-3fc33fc2b609@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8c484950-c99d-47c0-b048-5a447cffd719@bootlin.com>
Hello James,
On 12/22/23 16:36, Joao Marcos Costa wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Thanks for such a quick reply!
>
[...]
> I updated it to v2.9 and indeed it works. For documentation's sake:
>
> This is my /etc/iwd/main.conf:
>
> [General]
> EnableNetworkConfiguration=true
> Country=FR
> UseDefaultInterface=true
>
> [Network]
>
> [Scan]
> DisablePeriodicScan=true
>
> and this is my /var/lib/iwd/ap/test.ap:
>
> [General]
> DisableHT=true
> Channel=10
>
> [Security]
> Passphrase=password123
>
> [IPv4]
> Address=192.168.250.1
> Gateway=192.168.250.1
> Netmask=255.255.255.0
> DNSList=8.8.8.8
>
[...]
>> When helping Salahaldeen in the original thread I remember that
>> hardware being extremely flaky. It would start sometimes and not
>> others, and if it failed once it would need a full reboot to get it
>> working again. Even with hostapd if I used an option it didn't like
>> it required a full reboot to get it going again.
>>
>> IIRC there was also some success on one of the interfaces but not the
>> others. If you could provide some IWD debug logs too that would be
>> great, and might as well show the hostapd configuration that works as
>> well.
>
> I kept trying with muap0 interface, which worked fine.
>
> Just in case, here's my hostapd.conf:
>
> # the interface used by the AP
> interface=muap0
> # "g" simply means 2.4GHz band
> hw_mode=g
> # the channel to use
> channel=10
> # limit the frequencies used to those allowed in the country
> ieee80211d=1
> # the country code
> country_code=FR
> # 802.11n support
> ieee80211n=1
> # QoS support, also required for full speed on 802.11n/ac/ax
> wmm_enabled=1
>
> # the name of the AP
> ssid=test
>
> # 1=wpa, 2=wep, 3=both
> auth_algs=1
> # WPA2 only
> wpa=2
> wpa_key_mgmt=WPA-PSK
> rsn_pairwise=CCMP
> wpa_passphrase=password123
Would you remember if you faced performance issues with this
hardware/driver?
I'm using iwd v2.9 with the same main.conf and *.ap (except for the IP
addresses) as before, and this is what I get with iperf3:
iperf3 -c 10.0.24.1
Connecting to host 10.0.24.1, port 5201
[ 5] local 10.0.24.102 port 46170 connected to 10.0.24.1 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 768 KBytes 6.29 Mbits/sec 0 45.2 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 0 46.7 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 640 KBytes 5.24 Mbits/sec 0 49.5 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 384 KBytes 3.14 Mbits/sec 0 53.7 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 384 KBytes 3.15 Mbits/sec 0 53.7 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 0 53.7 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 256 KBytes 2.10 Mbits/sec 0 53.7 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 0 53.7 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 512 KBytes 4.19 Mbits/sec 0 53.7 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 768 KBytes 6.29 Mbits/sec 0 74.9 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 5.12 MBytes 4.30 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.05 sec 4.77 MBytes 3.98 Mbits/sec
receiver
iperf Done.
On the other hand, with hostapd (using the same hostapd.conf as before),
I'm getting considerably better results:
Connecting to host 192.168.0.1, port 5201
[ 5] local 192.168.0.2 port 44490 connected to 192.168.0.1 port 5201
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 12.1 MBytes 102 Mbits/sec 0 447 KBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 9.12 MBytes 76.5 Mbits/sec 0 472 KBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 9.50 MBytes 79.8 Mbits/sec 0 551 KBytes
[ 5] 3.00-4.00 sec 9.75 MBytes 81.7 Mbits/sec 0 611 KBytes
[ 5] 4.00-5.00 sec 10.4 MBytes 87.0 Mbits/sec 0 626 KBytes
[ 5] 5.00-6.00 sec 10.1 MBytes 85.0 Mbits/sec 0 626 KBytes
[ 5] 6.00-7.00 sec 11.5 MBytes 96.5 Mbits/sec 0 626 KBytes
[ 5] 7.00-8.00 sec 10.1 MBytes 84.9 Mbits/sec 0 626 KBytes
[ 5] 8.00-9.00 sec 12.8 MBytes 107 Mbits/sec 0 701 KBytes
[ 5] 9.00-10.00 sec 11.6 MBytes 97.4 Mbits/sec 0 747 KBytes
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr
[ 5] 0.00-10.00 sec 107 MBytes 89.7 Mbits/sec 0 sender
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 104 MBytes 86.9 Mbits/sec
receiver
iperf Done.
I tried removing 'DisableHT', but that raises some issues on the driver:
| CMD_RESP: cmd 0xb0 error, result=0x1
| IOCTL failed: 000000006106683e id=0x20000, sub_id=0x2000c action=1,
status_code=0x1
or:
No matching method found
Failed to retrieve I[ 610.756333] Block woal_cfg80211_set_power_mgmt in
abnormal driver state
WD dbus objects, quitting...
Could you please give me some insights on why we need DisableHT for it
to work?
Would you have any suggestions on how to approach this performance gap?
Thanks once more!
--
Best regards,
João Marcos Costa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-19 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-21 15:46 Iwd: unable to start AP with NXP 88W9098 chipset Joao Marcos Costa
2023-12-21 16:08 ` James Prestwood
2023-12-22 15:36 ` Joao Marcos Costa
2024-01-19 14:28 ` Joao Marcos Costa [this message]
2024-01-19 17:44 ` James Prestwood
2024-01-24 10:18 ` Joao Marcos Costa
2024-01-24 12:29 ` James Prestwood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=edd63888-bf1f-440f-98d1-3fc33fc2b609@bootlin.com \
--to=joaomarcos.costa@bootlin.com \
--cc=Salahaldeen.Altous@leica-camera.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=iwd@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=prestwoj@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox