[PATCH 6.12 035/626] fs/jbd2: use sleeping version of __find_get_block()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

6.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>

[ Upstream commit f76d4c28a46a9260d85e00dafc8f46d369365d33 ]

Convert to the new nonatomic flavor to benefit from potential
performance benefits and adapt in the future vs migration such
that semantics are kept.

- jbd2_journal_revoke(): can sleep (has might_sleep() in the beginning)

- jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(): only used from do_get_write_access() and
    do_get_create_access() which do sleep. So can sleep.

- jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags() - only called from journal commit code
    which sleeps. So can sleep.

Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Link: https://kdevops.org/ext4/v6.15-rc2.html # [0]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aAAEvcrmREWa1SKF@bombadil.infradead.org/ # [1]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250418015921.132400-6-dave@stgolabs.net
Tested-by: kdevops@lists.linux.dev
Reviewed-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 fs/jbd2/revoke.c | 15 +++++++++------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
index ce63d5fde9c3a..f68fc8c255f00 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/revoke.c
@@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
 	bh = bh_in;
 
 	if (!bh) {
-		bh = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
+		bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
+						journal->j_blocksize);
 		if (bh)
 			BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "found on hash");
 	}
@@ -355,7 +356,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_revoke(handle_t *handle, unsigned long long blocknr,
 
 		/* If there is a different buffer_head lying around in
 		 * memory anywhere... */
-		bh2 = __find_get_block(bdev, blocknr, journal->j_blocksize);
+		bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bdev, blocknr,
+						 journal->j_blocksize);
 		if (bh2) {
 			/* ... and it has RevokeValid status... */
 			if (bh2 != bh && buffer_revokevalid(bh2))
@@ -466,7 +468,8 @@ int jbd2_journal_cancel_revoke(handle_t *handle, struct journal_head *jh)
 	 * state machine will get very upset later on. */
 	if (need_cancel) {
 		struct buffer_head *bh2;
-		bh2 = __find_get_block(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr, bh->b_size);
+		bh2 = __find_get_block_nonatomic(bh->b_bdev, bh->b_blocknr,
+						 bh->b_size);
 		if (bh2) {
 			if (bh2 != bh)
 				clear_buffer_revoked(bh2);
@@ -495,9 +498,9 @@ void jbd2_clear_buffer_revoked_flags(journal_t *journal)
 			struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *record;
 			struct buffer_head *bh;
 			record = (struct jbd2_revoke_record_s *)list_entry;
-			bh = __find_get_block(journal->j_fs_dev,
-					      record->blocknr,
-					      journal->j_blocksize);
+			bh = __find_get_block_nonatomic(journal->j_fs_dev,
+							record->blocknr,
+							journal->j_blocksize);
 			if (bh) {
 				clear_buffer_revoked(bh);
 				__brelse(bh);
-- 
2.39.5