public inbox for kdevops@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>,
	"kdevops@lists.linux.dev" <kdevops@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] workflows: Workflow stub for Jorge Mora's nfstest suite
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 15:50:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BE30CD3-EAE7-46A4-9B6D-24CF4449D577@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZhlW_mPfdVRNNPtM@aion>



> On Apr 12, 2024, at 11:45 AM, Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 10 Apr 2024, cel@kernel.org wrote:
> 
>> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>> 
>> The nfstest suite is a detailed test of NFS functionality for NFS
>> versions 3 and newer, including delegation, attribute cache
>> consistency, sparse files, and server-to-server copy offload.
>> 
>> When configured in dedicated mode, each nfstest suite is run in a
>> separate target node to achieve good parallelism. You can select
>> specific test groups to run via Kconfig options.
> 
> I like the idea of running the tests in parallel, but would it be
> possible to also add an option to spin up a single node and run the
> tests sequentially?

Yes, that's possible. There are alternatives too.

You might run the nfstest workflow twice; once with
one set of a test groups, and then again with a
complementary set, for instance.


> I'm running kdevops via buildbot.  I have buildbot
> set up to monitor various upstream trees and trigger kdevops whenever
> new commits are pushed.  In addition, I have some nightly jobs that run
> against RHEL 8 & RHEL 9 kernels.  I'd like to throw nfstest into the
> mix, but I'm concerned that if each one of those is spinning up 8+ VMs
> my hypervisor will be under water.  Just a thought.

Well I'd like a way to kick off a full run of all the
file system-related workflows... I think adding a "meta
workflow" that can do that (perhaps sequentially) would
help both of us. Just spit-balling.


--
Chuck Lever



  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-12 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-10 14:50 [PATCH 1/4] workflows: Workflow stub for Jorge Mora's nfstest suite cel
2024-04-10 14:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] gen_nodes: Add support for the nfstest workflow cel
2024-04-10 14:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] gen_hosts: Add gen_hosts " cel
2024-04-10 14:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] roles: Add a playbook to run the nfstest suite cel
2024-04-11 17:49   ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 18:05     ` Chuck Lever
2024-04-11 18:51       ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 19:25         ` Chuck Lever
2024-04-11 19:55           ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-12 15:34   ` Scott Mayhew
2024-04-12 15:36     ` Chuck Lever III
2024-04-10 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] workflows: Workflow stub for Jorge Mora's " Chuck Lever
2024-04-11 16:43 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-04-11 17:41   ` Chuck Lever
2024-04-12 15:45 ` Scott Mayhew
2024-04-12 15:50   ` Chuck Lever III [this message]
2024-04-12 19:03     ` Chuck Lever III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BE30CD3-EAE7-46A4-9B6D-24CF4449D577@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=cel@kernel.org \
    --cc=kdevops@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=smayhew@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox