public inbox for kdevops@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kruces.com>,
	kdevops@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devconfig: enhance firstconfig on debian
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 14:51:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <842c8254-1054-4b54-94bd-e7d8a45b6886@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250418183345.4163050-1-mcgrof@kernel.org>

On 4/18/25 2:33 PM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> There's a slew of stupid packages we need to disable to make
> CI more robust and deterministic at bringup. The unattended-upgrades is
> one of them, the other one is the systemd-networkd-wait-online.service
> which is just broken on debian trixie in the way we setup networking.
> 
> Although there are devconfig tasks already to disable these, its not
> enough as devconfig playbook may not be run until later, and so we need
> to do this as early as possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> ---
>  .../tasks/install-deps/debian/main.yml        | 26 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/playbooks/roles/devconfig/tasks/install-deps/debian/main.yml b/playbooks/roles/devconfig/tasks/install-deps/debian/main.yml
> index 954f0aede3b2..dea648e21465 100644
> --- a/playbooks/roles/devconfig/tasks/install-deps/debian/main.yml
> +++ b/playbooks/roles/devconfig/tasks/install-deps/debian/main.yml
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>    register: unattended_upgrade_status
>    ignore_errors: true
>    changed_when: false
> +  tags: firstconfig
>  
>  - name: Set fact if unattended-upgrades is installed
>    set_fact:

The patch context leaves out this step:

 12 - name: Verify unattended-upgrades is not installed

 13   fail:

 14     msg: |

 15       The unattended-upgrades package is installed on the base
image, this
 16       can cause tons of issues with CIs. Fix this by running the
following
 17       commands:

 18

 19       make cleancache

 20       make bringup

 21   when:

 22     - unattended_upgrades_installed|bool

This step will still fail if the cloud OS image has unattended-upgrades
installed. Should the proposed patch remove this step (and maybe the
one right before it) too?


> @@ -20,6 +21,26 @@
>        make bringup
>    when:
>      - unattended_upgrades_installed|bool
> +  tags: firstconfig
> +
> +- name: Stop and disable unattended-upgrades related services
> +  become: yes
> +  become_flags: 'su - -c'
> +  become_method: sudo
> +  systemd:
> +    name: "{{ item }}"
> +    state: stopped
> +    enabled: no
> +    daemon_reload: yes
> +  loop:
> +    - unattended-upgrades
> +    - apt-daily.service
> +    - apt-daily.timer
> +    - apt-daily-upgrade.service
> +    - apt-daily-upgrade.timer
> +    - systemd-networkd-wait-online.service
> +  ignore_errors: yes
> +  tags: firstconfig
>  
>  - name: Upgrade Packages
>    become: yes
> @@ -34,7 +55,7 @@
>    delay: 60
>    tags: firstconfig
>  
> -- name: Remove unattended-upgrades package
> +- name: Remove unattended-upgrades package in case upgrade installed it
>    become: yes
>    become_flags: 'su - -c'
>    become_method: sudo
> @@ -45,6 +66,7 @@
>    retries: 20
>    delay: 30
>    until: removal_result is not failed
> +  tags: firstconfig
>  
>  - name: Remove optional unattended-upgrades configuration files if they exist
>    become: yes
> @@ -59,6 +81,7 @@
>      - /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50unattended-upgrades
>      - /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/52unattended-upgrades-local
>    ignore_errors: yes
> +  tags: firstconfig
>  
>  - name: Stop and disable unattended-upgrades related services
>    become: yes
> @@ -77,6 +100,7 @@
>      - apt-daily-upgrade.timer
>      - systemd-networkd-wait-online.service
>    ignore_errors: yes
> +  tags: firstconfig
>  
>  - name: Allow for distro source change / upgrade
>    become: yes

-- 
Chuck Lever


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-18 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-18 18:33 [PATCH] devconfig: enhance firstconfig on debian Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-18 18:51 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2025-04-18 19:23   ` Luis Chamberlain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=842c8254-1054-4b54-94bd-e7d8a45b6886@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=da.gomez@kruces.com \
    --cc=kdevops@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox