From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED4C0535BA for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2024 09:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709891750; cv=none; b=jK9t/7P4+P7Rv1QAxHPhNdFwbaAQ/NXt9w2FO17Lio4/FY+cg7tNGT4JmNii8bfw5/BEMqx28l0Pj29RaXHQMutS01dc5TxOUHTT5rDzqENpSdwRX8wtvrlzYbbgPOFawRjmJxnGGCCKxIDG6vc16UBdOPgpOjs1o/pqpkSEc+4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709891750; c=relaxed/simple; bh=6iGBosUrxcDQkjWHcSH7ZmjJHK3xTUpZ9INGEPwgjYM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=p6GMRsvJgV7EdS6uqNpf6NpJKo2HBxKPN68UzJ04p4Bz0jDgR0Lk4QYCUsM3xGfSGCzAJA6Mm7XfG/cpDxsizlhXs1+bWLxBPKDY3nYMkBYZB1Jshk90G2SDyizy9HO4UHTgfN2Z6rgZGRVHrwnY6UUmmvMnOVSakbGxW1V9NQk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=TvML7GBH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.137.202.133 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="TvML7GBH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Cc: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=UkD165XvHlnOCAbVYfNQEml8YVdqe7CwVsU6u0P8+Pc=; b=TvML7GBHZUW9dCoIvfYsxO880l tmYONXQq51URLXIUbhqsxKdpdcMCgKIBes8CgW4XZrA5G3HhOPAo42a0Zy7Mq2t2OjpuNoeBz7OtU E9rJhUAafqyFbVJtHGQGq9m16uUl6AT8TScfHjoE2Nz64eY1VGreUJLYyX0AY5SBzFt5SYadBxs3c eOqIq/mLsPYn/hFvRmCRHKNrgt2f3rKAOJbBTu+HFwBZQLuYt/m1zA6hKruKMKnshdRmnO7qVXOcW 9o+WSdBLPUU121O/sGm4e8x9qFBXGMw48MZdsKCPE/1hVGrHb2DD0M2pAwerJHFWc0fzXl/PbkzN4 NKa3tu8g==; Received: from mcgrof by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1riWx7-00000008eWw-1xhi for kdevops@lists.linux.dev; Fri, 08 Mar 2024 09:55:45 +0000 Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 01:55:45 -0800 From: Luis Chamberlain To: kdevops@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] guestfs: fixes and enhancements Message-ID: References: <20240308000400.1646823-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kdevops@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240308000400.1646823-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Sender: Luis Chamberlain On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 04:03:51PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > guestfs didn't work with multiple guests for me and it took me a while > to figure out why. The issue was a stupid bug where if you have the > ssh include directive without a new line it won't be processed. So the > last patch fixes that. > > The rest is general cleanup and sanity stuff. > > I tested with vagrant too to ensure the Kconfig changes don't break it. > > I'd like to wait to push until this is also tesed on aarch64 guests I didn't wait and pushed but I was confident it wouldn't break aarch64. Luis