From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel.org>
Cc: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kruces.com>,
kdevops@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFT] bootlinux: add bisection support
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 11:52:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBusA_3YwdGEwGED@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <w4qrydbr6jtly2cffqldcbc4rhiyuyg2qjjjua4k6alnqs3nt4@5beugfgelsfj>
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 12:38:25PM +0200, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 12:25:34PM +0100, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 12:21:51AM +0200, Daniel Gomez wrote:
> > > However, I was trying to find a convenient way to loop in Ansible and I haven't
> > > been able to find one. I was thinking in:
> >
> > Its the same chicken and egg problem with running fstests check for a long time,
> > and having a watchdog run to support a CI. We've now detatched the CI
> > stuff as part of the CI stuff, but similar questions came up long ago
> > when I tried to see if we could do both in one shot.
>
> I see.
>
> >
> > What I ended up finding was the async ansible stuff but I never ended up
> > mucking with it:
> >
> > https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/playbook_guide/playbooks_async.html
> >
> > Not sure if it helps here.
> >
> >
> > Luis
>
> I think the Ansible async task feature might be useful for step 4 (Wait until
> online), but it doesn't solve the overall problem.
>
> Going back to the workflow proposal:
>
> a. bisect-start target:
> 1. Ensures VM is booted
> 2. git bisect start
>
> b. bisect-loop target:
> 1. Capture GRUB list and ask user for index
> 2. Build, install kernel
> 3. Reboot VM
> 4. Wait until online
> 4.a git bisect bad if timeout or other custom condition
> 4.b git bisect good if online (and if custom condition succeeds)
> 6. Shutdown vm (regarless of good/bad)
> 7. Reconfigure grub to boot from user option
> 8. Start VM and goto 2.
>
> I think the CI loop approach suits better for this. What about something like
> this?
>
> bisect:
> ansible-playbook bisect.yml --tags bisect-init
> while ! [ -f .bisect-loop-finished ]; do \
> ansible-playbook bisect.yml
> done
Looks good!
Luis
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-07 18:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 0:09 [RFT] bootlinux: add bisection support Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-24 5:47 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-24 6:40 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-04-24 7:25 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-04-24 13:36 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-04-24 17:10 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-24 18:37 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-04-24 17:08 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-24 17:12 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-04-24 18:41 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-05-01 22:21 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-05-05 19:25 ` Luis Chamberlain
2025-05-07 10:38 ` Daniel Gomez
2025-05-07 18:52 ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBusA_3YwdGEwGED@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@kernel.org \
--cc=da.gomez@kruces.com \
--cc=kdevops@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox