From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E45CF165F1A for ; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:45:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753451108; cv=none; b=IO4W1viPqhixreYdliD2wCvvCchz3/y/PBOddplPNQZ4r8fTiDLLfBMX3gUsYPdIbeALvhIT3/T0Sg3L3e5Hy7Enzjq5ZBqYOylRmNd9bFE+EfZZi/ohDeyYlaD/rBbkpF1i9nLK3NXDOnflkLsE24Re9R8JLCWe4bug4PJoO3w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753451108; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1WedHj58H6sD+Z++eWkKtDpuaf40ODp/KlyQFYfPnMw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ijP5qF31vYuIOJyQXyhHg2NbgJpoUOoSfP5GldvirGiTiVtlXpTCdcbmr7fmjYjIgm3Ektp5OUhwTG4Yu56aMiaGIu7duAz2bk7suRL6esfFTdrBi6jTMVbD9WQG2o/l34Cy96+BkbxN6/ewRtYp7RTpHOXhlI6OhWwgroPtMRQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=uN///cIk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="uN///cIk" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64B2BC4CEE7; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:45:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753451107; bh=1WedHj58H6sD+Z++eWkKtDpuaf40ODp/KlyQFYfPnMw=; h=Date:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=uN///cIkjA1lUy9HOSOzkbiTyDBxVskkluWTV1y397YVdogqOpQHd3uUh/QnYO9vC 10IMT8VUdHTbENM5DVwkTeU90j+OIyYq+9rjjHMVLUgwnu+2xue/XMbbWwnMtZ+soj Hrp9vGRhjlGlH8L3JLim8PrN4RhVMspAu3zjqgLWHzXFp2J5ehLGvyDucXQSa8oedw gGrYRGr7IaoHMbeiw6vG9pvz2yNIIr2wWa1db4EGYXl0RfqYYnSQO+ieOhLoMy6Abj klqv7mrBgHI9Oo1L5FHlOA6N8jCwtZ31DItH1CxDXkfiiDaZ+4vp4WmH4HhQblZ+0t C9GkeNgA48O1A== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 15:45:04 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kdevops@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Reply-To: Daniel Gomez Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Align guest dependencies with their corresponding workflows To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: Chuck Lever , Scott Mayhew , Jeff Layton , kdevops@lists.linux.dev, Daniel Gomez References: <20250724-fixes-v1-0-9dfe3ce3cc21@samsung.com> <9f1938e6-ffaf-46ca-ad52-aa54d9b31840@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Daniel Gomez Organization: kernel.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 25/07/2025 10.15, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2025 at 1:09 AM Daniel Gomez wrote: > >> So, I was looking into having something like checkpatch some time ago. Now, with >> this generative AI there's no reason to wait. So I think it's a good idea to >> go with that. But it's missing b4 integration. "b4 prep --check" for the kernel >> runs checkpatch like this [1]: > > Sounds good. This patch was just in another series I have but if its > useful I figured I'd send it out. So no worries. But if you're going > to extend it with more stuff, if you can pick it up and extend it > that'd be neat as then I can just remove that from my future queue of > patches to post. I gather at this point this is just going to be > normal for us to use these tools to grow kdevops and so the sooner we > have sanity checks the better. Could you pick up this patch and amend > it with the ideas you have too? Then I'll just carry it locally until > you push it out and I can then ignore this patch later? Pushed it to my kdevops fork: https://github.com/dkruces/kdevops/tree/b4/checkpatch I'll play soon with Claude Code to run local checks for patches and see how far we can go. > > Luis