kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 1/4] slub: Drop lock at the end of free_debug_processing
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:44:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1455561864-4217-2-git-send-email-labbott@fedoraproject.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455561864-4217-1-git-send-email-labbott@fedoraproject.org>


Currently, free_debug_processing has a comment "Keep node_lock to preserve
integrity until the object is actually freed". In actuallity,
the lock is dropped immediately in __slab_free. Rather than wait until
__slab_free and potentially throw off the unlikely marking, just drop
the lock in __slab_free. This also lets free_debug_processing take
its own copy of the spinlock flags rather than trying to share the ones
from __slab_free. Since there is no use for the node afterwards, change
the return type of free_debug_processing to return an int like
alloc_debug_processing.

Credit to Mathias Krause for the original work which inspired this series

Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@fedoraproject.org>
---
I didn't add Christoph's ack from the last time due to some
rebasing.
---
 mm/slub.c | 23 ++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 2e1355a..2d5a774 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -1068,16 +1068,17 @@ bad:
 }
 
 /* Supports checking bulk free of a constructed freelist */
-static noinline struct kmem_cache_node *free_debug_processing(
+static noinline int free_debug_processing(
 	struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
 	void *head, void *tail, int bulk_cnt,
-	unsigned long addr, unsigned long *flags)
+	unsigned long addr)
 {
 	struct kmem_cache_node *n = get_node(s, page_to_nid(page));
 	void *object = head;
 	int cnt = 0;
+	unsigned long uninitialized_var(flags);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, *flags);
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&n->list_lock, flags);
 	slab_lock(page);
 
 	if (!check_slab(s, page))
@@ -1130,17 +1131,14 @@ out:
 			 bulk_cnt, cnt);
 
 	slab_unlock(page);
-	/*
-	 * Keep node_lock to preserve integrity
-	 * until the object is actually freed
-	 */
-	return n;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
+	return 1;
 
 fail:
 	slab_unlock(page);
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, *flags);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&n->list_lock, flags);
 	slab_fix(s, "Object at 0x%p not freed", object);
-	return NULL;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int __init setup_slub_debug(char *str)
@@ -1231,7 +1229,7 @@ static inline void setup_object_debug(struct kmem_cache *s,
 static inline int alloc_debug_processing(struct kmem_cache *s,
 	struct page *page, void *object, unsigned long addr) { return 0; }
 
-static inline struct kmem_cache_node *free_debug_processing(
+static inline int free_debug_processing(
 	struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
 	void *head, void *tail, int bulk_cnt,
 	unsigned long addr, unsigned long *flags) { return NULL; }
@@ -2648,8 +2646,7 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s, struct page *page,
 	stat(s, FREE_SLOWPATH);
 
 	if (kmem_cache_debug(s) &&
-	    !(n = free_debug_processing(s, page, head, tail, cnt,
-					addr, &flags)))
+	    !free_debug_processing(s, page, head, tail, cnt, addr))
 		return;
 
 	do {
-- 
2.5.0

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-15 18:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-15 18:44 [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 0/4] Improve performance for SLAB_POISON Laura Abbott
2016-02-15 18:44 ` Laura Abbott [this message]
2016-02-16 16:28   ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] slub: Drop lock at the end of free_debug_processing Christoph Lameter
2016-02-24 14:22   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-02-24 18:09     ` Laura Abbott
2016-02-15 18:44 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 2/4] slub: Fix/clean free_debug_processing return paths Laura Abbott
2016-02-16 16:30   ` [kernel-hardening] " Christoph Lameter
2016-02-15 18:44 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 3/4] slub: Convert SLAB_DEBUG_FREE to SLAB_CONSISTENCY_CHECKS Laura Abbott
2016-02-16 16:32   ` [kernel-hardening] " Christoph Lameter
2016-02-15 18:44 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCHv2 4/4] slub: Relax CMPXCHG consistency restrictions Laura Abbott
2016-02-16 16:33   ` [kernel-hardening] " Christoph Lameter
2016-02-18  8:39 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCHv2 0/4] Improve performance for SLAB_POISON Joonsoo Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1455561864-4217-2-git-send-email-labbott@fedoraproject.org \
    --to=labbott@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=js1304@gmail.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).