public inbox for kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] procfs io and taskstats infoleaks, proc/pid/* threats
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2011 21:35:01 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110625173430.GA3079@albatros> (raw)

(Bringing the subject to the list)

While implementing HARDEN_PROC and arguing with LKML folks about
usefullness of the feature, I've discovered /proc/pid/io and taskstats
interfaces can be used to gather rather sensitive information, like
password length:

http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2011/06/21/12

The suggested patches:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/24/88
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/24/89
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/24/91

taskstats patch is partial, it doesn't honor set{u,g}ids and processes
using caps.  For the full fix ptrace_task_may_access_current() is
needed, the patch adding it is pending:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/20/316
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/20/317


I'd appreciate if somebody points me how information stored in
sched, schedstats, stat, and status files can be exploited.  I suspect
it can be used similar way.


Other thoughts:

Files mountinfo, mounts store information related to the process' fs
namespace.  I feel this information can be somewhat private, e.g. mount
points can reveal private file pathes in case of separate namespaces
where this information cannot be learned by reading /proc/self/mountinfo. 

Files limits and status store process related restrictions.  I dunno
whether this can be considered as a private information.

I'd appeciate any comment.


Thanks,

-- 
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments

                 reply	other threads:[~2011-06-25 17:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110625173430.GA3079@albatros \
    --to=segoon@openwall.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox