From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
daniel.lezcano@free.fr, ebiederm@xmission.com, mingo@elte.hu,
rdunlap@xenotime.net, tj@kernel.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] shm: optimize locking and ipc_namespace getting
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 21:01:50 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110704170150.GA2806@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110704153757.GA9078@redhat.com>
shm_lock() does a lookup of shm segment in shm_ids(ns).ipcs_idr, which
is redundant as we already know shmid_kernel address. An actual lock is
also not required for reads until we really want to destroy the segment.
exit_shm() and shm_destroy_orphaned() may avoid the loop by checking
whether there is at least one segment in current ipc_namespace.
The check of nsproxy and ipc_ns against NULL is redundant as exit_shm()
is called from do_exit() before the call to exit_notify(), so the
dereferencing current->nsproxy->ipc_ns is guaranteed to be safe.
Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
---
ipc/shm.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/ipc/shm.c b/ipc/shm.c
index 3baae98..aa91236 100644
--- a/ipc/shm.c
+++ b/ipc/shm.c
@@ -131,6 +131,12 @@ static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_lock(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int id)
return container_of(ipcp, struct shmid_kernel, shm_perm);
}
+static inline void shm_lock_by_ptr(struct shmid_kernel *ipcp)
+{
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ spin_lock(&ipcp->shm_perm.lock);
+}
+
static inline struct shmid_kernel *shm_lock_check(struct ipc_namespace *ns,
int id)
{
@@ -231,18 +237,16 @@ static void shm_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
up_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
}
+/* Called with ns->shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex locked */
static int shm_try_destroy_current(int id, void *p, void *data)
{
struct ipc_namespace *ns = data;
- struct shmid_kernel *shp = shm_lock(ns, id);
-
- if (IS_ERR(shp))
- return 0;
+ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = p;
+ struct shmid_kernel *shp;
+ shp = container_of(ipcp, struct shmid_kernel, shm_perm);
- if (shp->shm_creator != current) {
- shm_unlock(shp);
+ if (shp->shm_creator != current)
return 0;
- }
/*
* Mark it as orphaned to destroy the segment when
@@ -255,64 +259,61 @@ static int shm_try_destroy_current(int id, void *p, void *data)
* Don't even try to destroy it. If shm_forced_rmid=0 and IPC_RMID
* is not set, it shouldn't be deleted here.
*/
- if (!ns->shm_forced_rmid) {
- shm_unlock(shp);
+ if (!ns->shm_forced_rmid)
return 0;
- }
- if (shm_may_destroy(ns, shp))
+ if (shm_may_destroy(ns, shp)) {
+ shm_lock_by_ptr(shp);
shm_destroy(ns, shp);
- else
- shm_unlock(shp);
+ }
return 0;
}
+/* Called with ns->shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex locked */
static int shm_try_destroy_orphaned(int id, void *p, void *data)
{
struct ipc_namespace *ns = data;
- struct shmid_kernel *shp = shm_lock(ns, id);
-
- if (IS_ERR(shp))
- return 0;
+ struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp = p;
+ struct shmid_kernel *shp;
+ shp = container_of(ipcp, struct shmid_kernel, shm_perm);
/*
* We want to destroy segments without users and with already
* exit'ed originating process.
+ *
+ * As shp->* are changed under rw_mutex, it's safe to skip shp locking.
*/
- if (shp->shm_creator != NULL) {
- shm_unlock(shp);
+ if (shp->shm_creator != NULL)
return 0;
- }
- if (shm_may_destroy(ns, shp))
+ if (shm_may_destroy(ns, shp)) {
+ shm_lock_by_ptr(shp);
shm_destroy(ns, shp);
- else
- shm_unlock(shp);
+ }
return 0;
}
void shm_destroy_orphaned(struct ipc_namespace *ns)
{
down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
- idr_for_each(&shm_ids(ns).ipcs_idr, &shm_try_destroy_orphaned, ns);
+ if (&shm_ids(ns).in_use)
+ idr_for_each(&shm_ids(ns).ipcs_idr,
+ &shm_try_destroy_orphaned,
+ ns);
up_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
}
void exit_shm(struct task_struct *task)
{
- struct nsproxy *nsp = task->nsproxy;
- struct ipc_namespace *ns;
-
- if (!nsp)
- return;
- ns = nsp->ipc_ns;
- if (!ns)
- return;
+ struct ipc_namespace *ns = task->nsproxy->ipc_ns;
/* Destroy all already created segments, but not mapped yet */
down_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
- idr_for_each(&shm_ids(ns).ipcs_idr, &shm_try_destroy_current, ns);
+ if (&shm_ids(ns).in_use)
+ idr_for_each(&shm_ids(ns).ipcs_idr,
+ &shm_try_destroy_current,
+ ns);
up_write(&shm_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
}
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-04 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <201106292214.p5TMEtHg015372@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <20110630134855.GA6165@mail.hallyn.com>
2011-06-30 13:57 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: + ipc-introduce-shm_rmid_forced-sysctl.patch added to -mm tree Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-03 18:00 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-04 11:55 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] shm: handle separate PID namespaces case Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-04 15:05 ` [kernel-hardening] " Oleg Nesterov
2011-07-04 15:26 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-04 15:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-07-04 15:48 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-04 17:01 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-07-04 17:29 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] shm: optimize locking and ipc_namespace getting Oleg Nesterov
2011-07-04 17:51 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-05 17:38 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-05 17:37 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v2] shm: handle separate PID namespaces case Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-15 6:45 ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-05 14:26 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] " Serge Hallyn
2011-07-05 14:50 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-05 15:57 ` Serge Hallyn
2011-07-05 17:42 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-06 16:31 ` Serge Hallyn
2011-07-06 16:57 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-06 18:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-07-06 18:35 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-05 17:29 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110704170150.GA2806@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@free.fr \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox