From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:14:50 +0400 From: Solar Designer Message-ID: <20110714151450.GA30153@openwall.com> References: <20110612130953.GA3709@albatros> <20110706173631.GA5431@albatros> <20110706185932.GB3299@albatros> <20110711165900.GA14319@openwall.com> <20110711185635.GA2072@albatros> <20110713094856.GA20924@openwall.com> <20110714141557.GA29900@openwall.com> <20110714142755.GA30981@albatros> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110714142755.GA30981@albatros> Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] RLIMIT_NPROC check in set_user() To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com List-ID: Vasiliy, On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 06:27:55PM +0400, Vasiliy Kulikov wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 18:15 +0400, Solar Designer wrote: > > I found it: > > > > Subject: [PATCH] set*uid() must not fail-and-return on OOM/rlimits > > http://lists.openwall.net/linux-kernel/2006/08/20/4 > > I've already referenced to it in the first email posted to LKML (as [2]): > http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2011/06/12/9 Oh, I did not check your references. Sorry. ;-( Alexander