From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] LWN: Reactive vs. pro-active kernel security
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 00:09:57 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110721200957.GA4124@openwall.com> (raw)
Hi,
Last week's LWN has a story on the kernel hardening work by Vasiliy,
Kees, and Dan - as well as on the difficulty in getting such patches
accepted upstream:
http://lwn.net/Articles/451405/
Of interest are the links to similar LWN stories on things that Kees and
Dan worked on (which Vasiliy thus excluded from his GSoC work so far).
These were symlink in +t directory hardening and kernel address non-leaks.
Alexander
reply other threads:[~2011-07-21 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110721200957.GA4124@openwall.com \
--to=solar@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox