public inbox for kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] -ow features
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 22:06:14 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110729180614.GB2623@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110729173037.GA12284@openwall.com>

Solar,

On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 21:30 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> > HARDEN_VM86
> > 
> > The code similar to -ow patch is ready, but I don't know how it should
> > be implemented relative to LSM/seccomp/etc.  It looks like a small
> > feature, which is not consistent with current upstream security
> > architecture.  I've described the problem here:
> > 
> > http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2011/06/19/2
> > 
> > Without the major change of the configuration mechanism it's impossible
> > to get it applied.
> 
> In -ow, there's also CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT.  When it is not enabled -
> and by default it is not - uselib(2) is disabled (returns -ENOSYS) and
> parts of binfmt_elf.c responsible for loading a.out libraries for ELF
> binaries are also disabled (truly ancient stuff).  We need something
> like this for 3.x and RHEL6 kernels too.
> 
> Maybe the CONFIG_BINFMT_ELF_AOUT option may be accepted upstream on the
> grounds that it's similar to other CONFIG_BINFMT_* options?

Do you propose to move all ELF_AOUT code to a configurable option, just
like STRICT_DEVMEM?  Looks like a good plan - kernel developers don't
like to support legacy stuff.  If it is moved to a config option, then
in some years it could be even fully removed (if I understand the AOUT
significance).

-- 
Vasiliy

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-29 18:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-23 16:27 [kernel-hardening] -ow features Solar Designer
2011-07-29  9:00 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-29 17:30   ` Solar Designer
2011-07-29 18:00     ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-07-29 18:06     ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2011-07-29 22:42       ` Solar Designer
2011-07-30 18:20         ` [kernel-hardening] BINFMT_ELF_AOUT (was: -ow features) Vasiliy Kulikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110729180614.GB2623@albatros \
    --to=segoon@openwall.com \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox