From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>,
Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@googlemail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH] shm: fix a race between shm_exit() and shm_init()
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 12:33:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110803123352.88670c9c.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFx_FMg2Y0jMrzYUpAqgxWFjxnFzzrqvysoqrYyz+Ue6BQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 21:43:23 -1000
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] shm: fix a race between shm_exit() and shm_init()
>
> This patch is disgusting.
>
I think it's buggy too.
>
> > + /*
> > + * For init_ipc_ns shm_ids().rw_mutex is statically initialized
> > + * as kernel threads should be able to use it in do_exit() before
> > + * shm_init(), which is called on do_initcall()
> > + */
> > + if (ns == &init_ipc_ns)
> > + ipc_init_ids(&shm_ids(ns));
> > + else
> > + ipc_init_ids(&shm_ids(ns));
afacit init_ipc_ns.ids[0].rw_mutex and init_ipc_ns.ids[1].rw_mutex
never get initialised with this patch?
Still. It seems that the real bug is that driver_init() is trying to
invoke userspace helpers before the kernel is ready to run userspace.
We could hack around it with something like
--- a/init/main.c~a
+++ a/init/main.c
@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ bool early_boot_irqs_disabled __read_mos
enum system_states system_state __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(system_state);
+/* This gets set when the kernel is ready to execute usermode code */
+bool usermode_available = false;
+
/*
* Boot command-line arguments
*/
@@ -804,6 +807,8 @@ static int __init kernel_init(void * unu
do_basic_setup();
+ usermode_available = true;
+
/* Open the /dev/console on the rootfs, this should never fail */
if (sys_open((const char __user *) "/dev/console", O_RDWR, 0) < 0)
printk(KERN_WARNING "Warning: unable to open an initial console.\n");
diff -puN include/linux/init.h~a include/linux/init.h
--- a/include/linux/init.h~a
+++ a/include/linux/init.h
@@ -149,6 +149,7 @@ extern int do_one_initcall(initcall_t fn
extern char __initdata boot_command_line[];
extern char *saved_command_line;
extern unsigned int reset_devices;
+extern bool usermode_available;
/* used by init/main.c */
void setup_arch(char **);
diff -puN kernel/kmod.c~a kernel/kmod.c
--- a/kernel/kmod.c~a
+++ a/kernel/kmod.c
@@ -418,6 +418,9 @@ int call_usermodehelper_exec(struct subp
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
int retval = 0;
+ if (usermode_available == false)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
helper_lock();
if (sub_info->path[0] == '\0')
goto out;
_
(which I think deserves a big fat WARN_ON() when it triggers)
But it would be better to fix driver_init() for real.
Save us, Kay!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-03 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-01 18:01 [kernel-hardening] initcall dependency problem (ns vs. threads) Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-01 18:20 ` [kernel-hardening] " Andrew Morton
2011-08-01 18:34 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-01 19:03 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-01 19:07 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-01 19:22 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-02 0:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-02 12:45 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH] shm: fix a race between shm_exit() and shm_init() Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-02 12:51 ` [kernel-hardening] " Manuel Lauss
2011-08-02 13:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2011-08-02 13:29 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-08-02 20:33 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-02 20:55 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-03 5:30 ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 8:05 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-08-03 8:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-03 10:04 ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 10:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-08-04 0:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-04 0:50 ` Andrew Morton
2011-08-04 1:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-04 1:15 ` Kay Sievers
2011-08-04 8:26 ` Marc Zyngier
2011-08-03 7:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-08-03 7:50 ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 8:00 ` Manuel Lauss
2011-08-03 19:33 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-08-03 19:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110803123352.88670c9c.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manuel.lauss@googlemail.com \
--cc=maz@misterjones.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox