From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 03:18:07 +0200 From: Andi Kleen Message-ID: <20110816011807.GA5782@one.firstfloor.org> References: <20110813062246.GC3851@albatros> <36fcaf94-2e99-47cb-a835-aefb79856429@email.android.com> <632d03b0-6725-431e-b100-13f5046b03e9@email.android.com> <20110814092028.GB14293@openwall.com> <01ba0cce-d28e-473e-be3a-7d3c8f185681@email.android.com> <20110815185114.GA20115@openwall.com> <4E496CAC.3030103@zytor.com> <20110815201419.GA20296@openwall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC] x86: restrict pid namespaces to 32 or 64 bit syscalls To: Eric Paris Cc: Solar Designer , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andi Kleen , Vasiliy Kulikov , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , James Morris , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Will Drewry List-ID: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 06:13:51PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > > > So how do we proceed from here?  Start by getting Will's patch applied? > > How to move forward with Will's patch is supposed to be discussed at > the invite only kernel summit October 23 - 25, 2011. As one of the linux-kernel is really the primary forum. If you want to discuss something just discuss it here (ideally with patches) May the best patch win. -Andi