From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] kmalloc() nofail allocations
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:05:12 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110822100512.GA2878@albatros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110822095354.GA13836@openwall.com>
Solar,
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 13:53 +0400, Solar Designer wrote:
> However, is there any difference for the caller between kmalloc()
> looping until success (and thus only returning on success) and it
> OOM-killing the current process (and thus also only returning on
> success)? Or does this question somehow not apply to the problem you
> discovered?
The "cannot fail" loop stops if the current task is marked as
to-be-killed-by-oom-killer. OOM killer doesn't immediately kill the
task, the task exits itself after the exit from kernel mode and a
scheduler step (AFAIU).
So, AFAICS, the loop is executed only if:
1) Appropriate flags are passed (no NOWAIT, etc.), sane NUMA node list is
passed (e.g. not GFP_THISNODE and node list without current node).
2) Size is not big (less than PAGE_SIZE << 3).
3) Debugging allocation failure injection is either off or has a
min size more than the current allocation size.
4) OOM killer didn't mark the task with TIF_MEMDIE.
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-22 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 19:15 [kernel-hardening] kmalloc() nofail allocations Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-20 14:27 ` [kernel-hardening] " Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-20 16:31 ` [kernel-hardening] " Solar Designer
2011-08-22 9:24 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 9:38 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-22 9:45 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2011-08-22 9:53 ` Solar Designer
2011-08-22 10:05 ` Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110822100512.GA2878@albatros \
--to=segoon@openwall.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox