From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2012 04:44:07 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox Message-ID: <20120108114407.GA22056@parisc-linux.org> References: <20120107185548.GA30748@outflux.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120107185548.GA30748@outflux.net> Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v2012.2] fs: symlink restrictions on sticky directories To: Kees Cook Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Viro , Rik van Riel , Federica Teodori , Lucian Adrian Grijincu , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Eric Paris , Randy Dunlap , Dan Rosenberg , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com List-ID: On Sat, Jan 07, 2012 at 10:55:48AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote: > v2012.2: > - Change sysctl mode to 0600, suggested by Ingo Molnar. > - Rework CONFIG logic to split code from default behavior. > - Renamed sysctl to have a "sysctl_" prefix, suggested by Andrew Morton. All the sysctl / CONFIG logic seems very complex. Why not make it a module parameter instead? It can be easily changed at boot time (specify kernel.insecure_symlinks=1 on the kernel command line) and, with a mode of 0600, can be modified at runtime too. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."