From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:32:16 +0400 From: Solar Designer Message-ID: <20130328073216.GA6962@openwall.com> References: <51534E5C.8070303@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20130327201251.GA6480@openwall.com> <515361D4.4040806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <515361D4.4040806@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: Security vulnerability tools To: Corey Bryant Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, oss-security@lists.openwall.com List-ID: On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 05:17:08PM -0400, Corey Bryant wrote: > On 03/27/2013 04:12 PM, Solar Designer wrote: > >Guys, can we continue this thread on oss-security only, please? It is a > >topic for oss-security, but less so for kernel-hardening. Anyone on > >kernel-hardening who is interested in this topic should join oss-security. > > > >Just drop kernel-hardening from further replies. > > Sure, sorry about that. I am interested in tools that are applicable to > the kernel too though, if that changes anything. It makes sense for you to post a summary of the relevant ones of your updates to http://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/tools to kernel-hardening after this discussion thread on oss-security is mostly over. Other than that, I think it's best to keep the thread on oss-security only. Cross-posting all or almost all of it is a mess. (Hopefully, this is the last cross-post I have to make in this thread.) Thanks! Alexander