kernel-hardening.lists.openwall.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
To: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC] kernel/panic: place an upper limit on number of oopses
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:51:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160112235117.GA2537@pc.thejh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mvsa5q40.fsf@gamma.ozlabs.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 852 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:34:39AM +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net> writes:
> > +	 * limit is reached, just panic.
> > +	 * The constant used as limit should be low enough to
> > +	 * mitigate this kind of exploitation attempt, but high
> > +	 * enough to avoid unnecessary panics.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (atomic_inc_return(&oops_counter) >= 0x100000 &&
> > +			panic_on_oops == 0) {
> Do you need to check panic_on_oops? If it was 1 you'd already have
> paniced, right?
[...]
> > +		pr_emerg("oopsed too often, setting panic_on_oops=1\n");
> > +		panic_on_oops = 1;
> Would it be easier to just panic here, rather than wait for another oops?

Ah, yes. So the code would be just this, apart from the definition of
oops_counter:

        if (atomic_inc_return(&oops_counter) >= 0x100000)
                panic("oopsed too often\n");

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-12 23:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-12 19:25 [kernel-hardening] [RFC] kernel/panic: place an upper limit on number of oopses Jann Horn
2016-01-12 23:34 ` [kernel-hardening] " Daniel Axtens
2016-01-12 23:51   ` Jann Horn [this message]
2016-01-13  0:20   ` Solar Designer
2016-01-13  0:33     ` Daniel Axtens
2016-01-13 18:08     ` Jann Horn
2016-01-17  3:58       ` Jann Horn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160112235117.GA2537@pc.thejh.net \
    --to=jann@thejh.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).