From: Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net>
To: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC] kernel/panic: place an upper limit on number of oopses
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:51:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160112235117.GA2537@pc.thejh.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mvsa5q40.fsf@gamma.ozlabs.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 852 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 10:34:39AM +1100, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Jann Horn <jann@thejh.net> writes:
> > + * limit is reached, just panic.
> > + * The constant used as limit should be low enough to
> > + * mitigate this kind of exploitation attempt, but high
> > + * enough to avoid unnecessary panics.
> > + */
> > + if (atomic_inc_return(&oops_counter) >= 0x100000 &&
> > + panic_on_oops == 0) {
> Do you need to check panic_on_oops? If it was 1 you'd already have
> paniced, right?
[...]
> > + pr_emerg("oopsed too often, setting panic_on_oops=1\n");
> > + panic_on_oops = 1;
> Would it be easier to just panic here, rather than wait for another oops?
Ah, yes. So the code would be just this, apart from the definition of
oops_counter:
if (atomic_inc_return(&oops_counter) >= 0x100000)
panic("oopsed too often\n");
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-12 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-12 19:25 [kernel-hardening] [RFC] kernel/panic: place an upper limit on number of oopses Jann Horn
2016-01-12 23:34 ` [kernel-hardening] " Daniel Axtens
2016-01-12 23:51 ` Jann Horn [this message]
2016-01-13 0:20 ` Solar Designer
2016-01-13 0:33 ` Daniel Axtens
2016-01-13 18:08 ` Jann Horn
2016-01-17 3:58 ` Jann Horn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160112235117.GA2537@pc.thejh.net \
--to=jann@thejh.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).