From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Reply-To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 06:33:53 +0300 From: Solar Designer Message-ID: <20160220033353.GA2139@openwall.com> References: <20160219182538.GA71114@davidb.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160219182538.GA71114@davidb.org> Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Meta: Adding 'List-id' header to kernel-hardening posts To: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com List-ID: David, On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 11:25:38AM -0700, David Brown wrote: > I have been unable to locate a contact address for someone who > maintains this mailing list, That would mostly be me. > so I'm resorting to sending to the full > list. Apologies in advance for the noise this causes. There is: kernel-hardening-admin at lists.openwall.com This address is given in some of ezmlm's help texts. > I have noticed that this mailing list software inserts a non-standard > header to identify the list "Mailing-list:" instead of the RFC2919 > (https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2919.txt) "List-id" header. Depending on > the particular mail hosting and software, this can make filting on > this particular list either difficult or impossible. As Jason correctly pointed out, we do already have a List-ID header. Do you require it to be spelled List-id? I doubt that trying to match a specific case-sensitive spelling is a good idea, since if some client software is broken to only look for List-id, some other might only look for List-ID. Alexander