From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Sender: Ingo Molnar Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 09:03:32 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar Message-ID: <20170221080332.GB3125@gmail.com> References: <20170214194259.75960-1-thgarnie@google.com> <20170214194259.75960-4-thgarnie@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] KVM: VMX: Simplify segment_base To: Thomas Garnier , Paolo Bonzini Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Jim Mattson , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Dmitry Vyukov , Kees Cook , Andy Lutomirski , Borislav Petkov , Paul Gortmaker , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , Jiri Kosina , Matt Fleming , Ard Biesheuvel , Boris Ostrovsky , Juergen Gross , Rusty Russell , Peter Zijlstra , Christian Borntraeger , "Luis R . Rodriguez" , He Chen , Brian Gerst , Stanislaw Gruszka , Arnd Bergmann , Adam Buchbinder , Dave Hansen , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Josh Poimboeuf , Tim Chen , Rik van Riel , Andi Kleen , Jiri Olsa , Michael Ellerman , Joerg Roedel , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , the arch/x86 maintainers , LKML , kasan-dev , Linux PM list , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , lguest@lists.ozlabs.org, kvm list , Kernel Hardening List-ID: * Thomas Garnier wrote: > > Okay, I guess I will have to wait for it to be integrated to > > linux-next then. Or would you rather to it after this patch set is > > added? > > Read your summary for the patchset of KVM cleanup, I will wait for it to reach > linux-next to rebase and send the new iteration. Note that to be able to apply your readonly-GDT series to the x86 tree I'll need a stable SHA1 to base it on. Paolo, how stable, non-rebasing are the KVM tree commits? Once Andy's patches hit the KVM tree I could pull from you and order it so that I'd send it to Linus only after you sent your bits upstream. That would save us 3 months of patch propagation latency. Or should we keep Andy's KVM patches together with the GDT patches? Either workflow works for me - it's your call as these are predominantly KVM changes. Thanks, Ingo