public inbox for kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@edkovsky.org>
To: jeyu@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, keescook@chromium.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 0/2] provide check for ro_after_init memory sections
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:08:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170326210825.23255-1-ewk@edkovsky.org> (raw)

Provide a mechanism for other functions to verify that their arguments
are read-only.

This implements the first half of a suggestion made by Kees Cook for
the Kernel Self Protection Project:

    - provide mechanism to check for ro_after_init memory areas, and
      reject structures not marked ro_after_init in vmbus_register()

      http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/02/04/1

The idea is to prevent structures (including modules) that are not
read-only from being passed to functions. It builds upon the functions
in kernel/extable.c that test if an address is in the text section.

I have dropped the third patch that uses these features to check the
arguments to vmbus_register() because the maintainers have not been
receptive to using it. My goal right now is to get the API right.

I have test compiled this series on next-20170324 for x86.

Eddie Kovsky (2):
  module: verify address is read-only
  extable: verify address is read-only

 include/linux/kernel.h |  2 ++
 include/linux/module.h | 12 ++++++++++++
 kernel/extable.c       | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 kernel/module.c        | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 96 insertions(+)

-- 
2.12.1

             reply	other threads:[~2017-03-26 21:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-26 21:08 Eddie Kovsky [this message]
2017-03-26 21:08 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 1/2] module: verify address is read-only Eddie Kovsky
2017-03-30  3:31   ` [kernel-hardening] " Jessica Yu
2017-03-26 21:08 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 2/2] extable: " Eddie Kovsky
2017-03-27  8:43   ` [kernel-hardening] " kbuild test robot
2017-03-27 18:42     ` Kees Cook
2017-03-29  3:28       ` Eddie Kovsky
2017-03-30  3:27         ` Jessica Yu
2017-03-30 16:24           ` Kees Cook
2017-03-31  3:09             ` Eddie Kovsky
2017-04-03 22:10           ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170326210825.23255-1-ewk@edkovsky.org \
    --to=ewk@edkovsky.org \
    --cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox