From: Eddie Kovsky <ewk@edkovsky.org>
To: jeyu@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, keescook@chromium.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 0/2] provide check for ro_after_init memory sections
Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:08:23 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170326210825.23255-1-ewk@edkovsky.org> (raw)
Provide a mechanism for other functions to verify that their arguments
are read-only.
This implements the first half of a suggestion made by Kees Cook for
the Kernel Self Protection Project:
- provide mechanism to check for ro_after_init memory areas, and
reject structures not marked ro_after_init in vmbus_register()
http://www.openwall.com/lists/kernel-hardening/2017/02/04/1
The idea is to prevent structures (including modules) that are not
read-only from being passed to functions. It builds upon the functions
in kernel/extable.c that test if an address is in the text section.
I have dropped the third patch that uses these features to check the
arguments to vmbus_register() because the maintainers have not been
receptive to using it. My goal right now is to get the API right.
I have test compiled this series on next-20170324 for x86.
Eddie Kovsky (2):
module: verify address is read-only
extable: verify address is read-only
include/linux/kernel.h | 2 ++
include/linux/module.h | 12 ++++++++++++
kernel/extable.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
kernel/module.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
--
2.12.1
next reply other threads:[~2017-03-26 21:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-26 21:08 Eddie Kovsky [this message]
2017-03-26 21:08 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 1/2] module: verify address is read-only Eddie Kovsky
2017-03-30 3:31 ` [kernel-hardening] " Jessica Yu
2017-03-26 21:08 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v4 2/2] extable: " Eddie Kovsky
2017-03-27 8:43 ` [kernel-hardening] " kbuild test robot
2017-03-27 18:42 ` Kees Cook
2017-03-29 3:28 ` Eddie Kovsky
2017-03-30 3:27 ` Jessica Yu
2017-03-30 16:24 ` Kees Cook
2017-03-31 3:09 ` Eddie Kovsky
2017-04-03 22:10 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170326210825.23255-1-ewk@edkovsky.org \
--to=ewk@edkovsky.org \
--cc=jeyu@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox