From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 09:42:29 -0700 From: Sean Christopherson Subject: gRe: [PATCH V5 1/5] KVM: X86: Memory ROE documentation Message-ID: <20181029164229.GA27144@linux.intel.com> References: <20181026151223.16810-1-ahmedsoliman0x666@gmail.com> <20181026151223.16810-2-ahmedsoliman0x666@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181026151223.16810-2-ahmedsoliman0x666@gmail.com> To: Ahmed Abd El Mawgood Cc: Paolo Bonzini , rkrcmar@redhat.com, Jonathan Corbet , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ovich00@gmail.com, kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, nigel.edwards@hpe.com, Boris Lukashev , Hossam Hassan <7ossam9063@gmail.com>, Ahmed Lotfy List-ID: On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 05:12:19PM +0200, Ahmed Abd El Mawgood wrote: > Following up with my previous threads on KVM assisted Anti rootkit > protections. All of the changelogs in this series need to be rewritten to adhere to Documentation/process[1]. In particular, use imperative mood and describe why/what is being done in a self-contained manner, e.g. the above line isn't very helpful without a lot of prior context. [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#2-describe-your-changes > The current version doesn't address the attacks involving pages > remapping. It is still design in progress, nevertheless, it will be in > my later patch sets. This series should be tagged RFC if its design is a WIP.