From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Emese Revfy <re.emese@gmail.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>,
Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gcc-plugins: make it possible to disable CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS again
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 09:44:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201912120943.486E507@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1dH+msCgxU-=w4gp30Bw+x3=6Cj473DuFzxun+3dfOcA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 10:59:40AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 5:52 AM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:40 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > I noticed that randconfig builds with gcc no longer produce a lot of
> > > ccache hits, unlike with clang, and traced this back to plugins
> > > now being enabled unconditionally if they are supported.
> > >
> > > I am now working around this by adding
> > >
> > > export CCACHE_COMPILERCHECK=/usr/bin/size -A %compiler%
> > >
> > > to my top-level Makefile. This changes the heuristic that ccache uses
> > > to determine whether the plugins are the same after a 'make clean'.
> > >
> > > However, it also seems that being able to just turn off the plugins is
> > > generally useful, at least for build testing it adds noticeable overhead
> > > but does not find a lot of bugs additional bugs, and may be easier for
> > > ccache users than my workaround.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 9f671e58159a ("security: Create "kernel hardening" config area")
> > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 2:59 PM Ard Biesheuvel
> <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
> >Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks! Who would be the best person to pick up the patch?
> Should I send it to Andrew?
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
I can take it in my tree, or I'm happy to have Masahiro take it.
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-12 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-11 13:39 [PATCH] gcc-plugins: make it possible to disable CONFIG_GCC_PLUGINS again Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-11 13:59 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-12-12 4:51 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-12-12 9:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-12-12 17:44 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-12-14 8:56 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-12-30 19:41 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201912120943.486E507@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=re.emese@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox