public inbox for kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] overflow: Add __must_check attribute to check_*() helpers
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:23:27 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200813112327.GF17456@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202008121450.405E4A3@keescook>

On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 02:51:52PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> +/*
> + * Allows to effectively us apply __must_check to a macro so we can have
> + * both the type-agnostic benefits of the macros while also being able to
> + * enforce that the return value is, in fact, checked.
> + */
> +static inline bool __must_check __must_check_bool(bool condition)
> +{
> +	return unlikely(condition);
> +}

I'm fine with the concept, but this is a weirdly-generically-named
function that has a very specific unlikely() in it.  So I'd call
this __must_check_overflow() and then it's obvious that overflow is
unlikely(), whereas it's not obvious that __must_check_bool() is going
to be unlikely().


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-13 11:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-12 21:51 [PATCH] overflow: Add __must_check attribute to check_*() helpers Kees Cook
2020-08-13  6:39 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-08-15 17:11   ` Kees Cook
2020-08-13 11:23 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-08-13 11:33   ` Rasmus Villemoes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200813112327.GF17456@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox