From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2C4C43331 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mother.openwall.net (mother.openwall.net [195.42.179.200]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F54E20693 for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 18:44:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8F54E20693 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kernel-hardening-return-16852-kernel-hardening=archiver.kernel.org@lists.openwall.com Received: (qmail 32586 invoked by uid 550); 6 Sep 2019 18:44:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact kernel-hardening-help@lists.openwall.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-ID: Received: (qmail 32561 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2019 18:44:25 -0000 From: Florian Weimer To: Jeff Layton Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= , =?utf-8?Q?Micka=C3=ABl_Sala=C3=BCn?= , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Aleksa Sarai , Alexei Starovoitov , Al Viro , Andy Lutomirski , Christian Heimes , Daniel Borkmann , Eric Chiang , James Morris , Jan Kara , Jann Horn , Jonathan Corbet , Kees Cook , Matthew Garrett , Matthew Wilcox , Michael Kerrisk , Mimi Zohar , Philippe =?utf-8?Q?Tr=C3=A9buchet?= , Scott Shell , Sean Christopherson , Shuah Khan , Song Liu , Steve Dower , Steve Grubb , Thibaut Sautereau , Vincent Strubel , Yves-Alexis Perez , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] fs: Add support for an O_MAYEXEC flag on sys_open() References: <20190906152455.22757-1-mic@digikod.net> <20190906152455.22757-2-mic@digikod.net> <87ef0te7v3.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> <75442f3b-a3d8-12db-579a-2c5983426b4d@ssi.gouv.fr> <1fbf54f6-7597-3633-a76c-11c4b2481add@ssi.gouv.fr> <5a59b309f9d0603d8481a483e16b5d12ecb77540.camel@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2019 20:44:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5a59b309f9d0603d8481a483e16b5d12ecb77540.camel@kernel.org> (Jeff Layton's message of "Fri, 06 Sep 2019 14:38:11 -0400") Message-ID: <87r24tcljg.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.63]); Fri, 06 Sep 2019 18:44:13 +0000 (UTC) * Jeff Layton: > Even better would be to declare the new flag in some openat2-only flag > space, so there's no confusion about it being supported by legacy open > calls. Isn't that desirable anyway because otherwise fcntl with F_GETFL will give really confusing results? > If glibc wants to implement an open -> openat2 wrapper in userland > later, it can set that flag in the wrapper implicitly to emulate the old > behavior. I see us rather doing the opposite, i.e. implement openat2 with non-exotic flags using openat. But we've bitten by this in the past, so maybe that's not such a great idea. It's tempting to make the same mistake again for every new system call. Thanks, Florian