From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com"
<kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com>,
Marco Benatto <marco.antonio.780@gmail.com>,
Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@canonical.com>
Subject: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v6 11/11] lkdtm: Add test for XPFO
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:08:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jJSp+8_AgGiG8f8ZaJvCzyk-jTumTAxcVc9yRm_z0OWCw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170907173609.22696-12-tycho@docker.com>
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com> wrote:
> From: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@canonical.com>
>
> This test simply reads from userspace memory via the kernel's linear
> map.
>
> v6: * drop an #ifdef, just let the test fail if XPFO is not supported
> * add XPFO_SMP test to try and test the case when one CPU does an xpfo
> unmap of an address, that it can't be used accidentally by other
> CPUs.
This is very close! Thanks for the updates. :) Notes below...
>
> Signed-off-by: Juerg Haefliger <juerg.haefliger@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tycho Andersen <tycho@docker.com>
> Tested-by: Marco Benatto <marco.antonio.780@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/misc/lkdtm.h | 5 ++
> drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c | 3 +
> drivers/misc/lkdtm_xpfo.c | 194 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 203 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/Makefile b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> index b0b766416306..8447b42a447d 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_heap.o
> lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_perms.o
> lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_rodata_objcopy.o
> lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_usercopy.o
> +lkdtm-$(CONFIG_LKDTM) += lkdtm_xpfo.o
>
> KCOV_INSTRUMENT_lkdtm_rodata.o := n
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> index 3b4976396ec4..34a6ee37f216 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm.h
> @@ -64,4 +64,9 @@ void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM(void);
> void lkdtm_USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND(void);
> void lkdtm_USERCOPY_KERNEL(void);
>
> +/* lkdtm_xpfo.c */
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_READ_USER(void);
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_READ_USER_HUGE(void);
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_SMP(void);
> +
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> index 42d2b8e31e6b..9544e329de4b 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_core.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,9 @@ struct crashtype crashtypes[] = {
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_FRAME_FROM),
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_STACK_BEYOND),
> CRASHTYPE(USERCOPY_KERNEL),
> + CRASHTYPE(XPFO_READ_USER),
> + CRASHTYPE(XPFO_READ_USER_HUGE),
> + CRASHTYPE(XPFO_SMP),
> };
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/lkdtm_xpfo.c b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_xpfo.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d903063bdd0b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/misc/lkdtm_xpfo.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
> +/*
> + * This is for all the tests related to XPFO (eXclusive Page Frame Ownership).
> + */
> +
> +#include "lkdtm.h"
> +
> +#include <linux/cpumask.h>
> +#include <linux/mman.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/xpfo.h>
> +#include <linux/kthread.h>
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/sched/task.h>
> +
> +#define XPFO_DATA 0xdeadbeef
> +
> +static unsigned long do_map(unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + unsigned long user_addr, user_data = XPFO_DATA;
> +
> + user_addr = vm_mmap(NULL, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
> + PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE | PROT_EXEC,
> + flags, 0);
> + if (user_addr >= TASK_SIZE) {
> + pr_warn("Failed to allocate user memory\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)user_addr, &user_data,
> + sizeof(user_data))) {
> + pr_warn("copy_to_user failed\n");
> + goto free_user;
> + }
> +
> + return user_addr;
> +
> +free_user:
> + vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long *user_to_kernel(unsigned long user_addr)
> +{
> + phys_addr_t phys_addr;
> + void *virt_addr;
> +
> + phys_addr = user_virt_to_phys(user_addr);
> + if (!phys_addr) {
> + pr_warn("Failed to get physical address of user memory\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + virt_addr = phys_to_virt(phys_addr);
> + if (phys_addr != virt_to_phys(virt_addr)) {
> + pr_warn("Physical address of user memory seems incorrect\n");
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return virt_addr;
> +}
> +
> +static void read_map(unsigned long *virt_addr)
> +{
> + pr_info("Attempting bad read from kernel address %p\n", virt_addr);
> + if (*(unsigned long *)virt_addr == XPFO_DATA)
> + pr_err("FAIL: Bad read succeeded?!\n");
> + else
> + pr_err("FAIL: Bad read didn't fail but data is incorrect?!\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void read_user_with_flags(unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + unsigned long user_addr, *kernel;
> +
> + user_addr = do_map(flags);
> + if (!user_addr) {
> + pr_err("FAIL: map failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + kernel = user_to_kernel(user_addr);
> + if (!kernel) {
> + pr_err("FAIL: user to kernel conversion failed\n");
> + goto free_user;
> + }
> +
> + read_map(kernel);
> +
> +free_user:
> + vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> +}
> +
> +/* Read from userspace via the kernel's linear map. */
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_READ_USER(void)
> +{
> + read_user_with_flags(MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS);
> +}
> +
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_READ_USER_HUGE(void)
> +{
> + read_user_with_flags(MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_HUGETLB);
> +}
> +
> +struct smp_arg {
> + unsigned long *virt_addr;
> + unsigned int cpu;
> +};
> +
> +static int smp_reader(void *parg)
> +{
> + struct smp_arg *arg = parg;
> + unsigned long *virt_addr;
> +
> + if (arg->cpu != smp_processor_id()) {
> + pr_err("FAIL: scheduled on wrong CPU?\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + virt_addr = smp_cond_load_acquire(&arg->virt_addr, VAL != NULL);
> + read_map(virt_addr);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> +#define XPFO_SMP_KILLED SIGKILL
> +#elif CONFIG_ARM64
> +#define XPFO_SMP_KILLED SIGSEGV
> +#else
> +#error unsupported arch
> +#endif
This will fail the build for other architectures, so I would just do
this as an single if/else:
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
# define XPFO_SMP_KILLED SIGSEGV
#else
# define XPFO_SMP_KILLED SIGKILL
#endif
> +
> +/* The idea here is to read from the kernel's map on a different thread than
Comment style nit: leading /*\n please...
> + * did the mapping (and thus the TLB flushing), to make sure that the page
> + * faults on other cores too.
> + */
> +void lkdtm_XPFO_SMP(void)
> +{
> + unsigned long user_addr, *virt_addr;
> + struct task_struct *thread;
> + int ret;
> + struct smp_arg arg;
> +
> + if (num_online_cpus() < 2) {
> + pr_err("not enough to do a multi cpu test\n");
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + arg.virt_addr = NULL;
> + arg.cpu = (smp_processor_id() + 1) % num_online_cpus();
> + thread = kthread_create(smp_reader, &arg, "lkdtm_xpfo_test");
> + if (IS_ERR(thread)) {
> + pr_err("couldn't create kthread? %ld\n", PTR_ERR(thread));
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + kthread_bind(thread, arg.cpu);
> + get_task_struct(thread);
> + wake_up_process(thread);
> +
> + user_addr = do_map(MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS);
> + if (!user_addr)
> + goto kill_thread;
> +
> + virt_addr = user_to_kernel(user_addr);
> + if (!virt_addr) {
> + /*
> + * let's store something that will fail, so we can unblock the
> + * thread
> + */
> + smp_store_release(&arg.virt_addr, &arg);
> + goto free_user;
> + }
> +
> + smp_store_release(&arg.virt_addr, virt_addr);
> +
> + /* there must be a better way to do this. */
> + while (1) {
> + if (thread->exit_state)
> + break;
> + msleep_interruptible(100);
> + }
I don't like infinite loops. How about giving this a 1 second max runtime?
> +
> +free_user:
> + if (user_addr)
> + vm_munmap(user_addr, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> +kill_thread:
> + ret = kthread_stop(thread);
> + if (ret != XPFO_SMP_KILLED)
> + pr_err("FAIL: thread wasn't killed: %d\n", ret);
> + put_task_struct(thread);
> +}
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Otherwise it looks great, thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Pixel Security
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-07 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-07 17:35 [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 00/11] Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 17:35 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 01/11] mm: add MAP_HUGETLB support to vm_mmap Tycho Andersen
2017-09-08 7:42 ` [kernel-hardening] " Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 02/11] x86: always set IF before oopsing from page fault Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 03/11] mm, x86: Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership (XPFO) Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 18:33 ` [kernel-hardening] " Ralph Campbell
2017-09-07 18:50 ` [kernel-hardening] " Tycho Andersen
2017-09-08 7:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-08 14:58 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-09 15:35 ` Laura Abbott
2017-09-11 15:03 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-11 7:24 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-09-11 14:50 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-11 16:03 ` Juerg Haefliger
2017-09-11 16:59 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-12 8:05 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-09-12 14:36 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-12 18:13 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-14 6:15 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-09-20 23:46 ` Dave Hansen
2017-09-21 0:02 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-21 0:04 ` Dave Hansen
2017-09-11 18:32 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-11 21:54 ` Marco Benatto
2017-09-20 15:48 ` Dave Hansen
2017-09-20 22:34 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-20 23:21 ` Dave Hansen
2017-09-21 0:09 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-21 0:27 ` Dave Hansen
2017-09-21 1:37 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-11-10 1:09 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-11-13 22:20 ` Dave Hansen
2017-11-13 22:46 ` Dave Hansen
2017-11-15 0:33 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-11-15 0:37 ` Dave Hansen
2017-11-15 0:42 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-11-15 3:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-11-15 7:00 ` Dave Hansen
2017-11-15 14:58 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-11-15 16:20 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-11-15 21:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-09-21 0:03 ` Dave Hansen
2017-09-21 0:28 ` Dave Hansen
2017-09-21 1:04 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 04/11] swiotlb: Map the buffer if it was unmapped by XPFO Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 18:10 ` [kernel-hardening] " Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-07 18:44 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-08 7:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 05/11] arm64/mm: Add support for XPFO Tycho Andersen
2017-09-08 7:53 ` [kernel-hardening] " Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-08 17:24 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-14 10:41 ` Julien Grall
2017-09-14 11:29 ` Juergen Gross
2017-09-14 18:22 ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2017-09-18 21:27 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 06/11] xpfo: add primitives for mapping underlying memory Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 07/11] arm64/mm, xpfo: temporarily map dcache regions Tycho Andersen
2017-09-14 18:25 ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2017-09-18 21:29 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 08/11] arm64/mm: Add support for XPFO to swiotlb Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 09/11] arm64/mm: disable section/contiguous mappings if XPFO is enabled Tycho Andersen
2017-09-09 15:38 ` [kernel-hardening] " Laura Abbott
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 10/11] mm: add a user_virt_to_phys symbol Tycho Andersen
2017-09-08 7:55 ` [kernel-hardening] " Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-08 15:44 ` Kees Cook
2017-09-11 7:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-14 18:34 ` [kernel-hardening] " Mark Rutland
2017-09-18 20:56 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 17:36 ` [kernel-hardening] [PATCH v6 11/11] lkdtm: Add test for XPFO Tycho Andersen
2017-09-07 19:08 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2017-09-10 0:57 ` [kernel-hardening] " kbuild test robot
2017-09-11 10:34 ` [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH v6 00/11] Add support for eXclusive Page Frame Ownership Yisheng Xie
2017-09-11 15:02 ` Tycho Andersen
2017-09-12 7:07 ` Yisheng Xie
2017-09-12 7:40 ` Juerg Haefliger
2017-09-12 8:11 ` Yisheng Xie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAGXu5jJSp+8_AgGiG8f8ZaJvCzyk-jTumTAxcVc9yRm_z0OWCw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=juerg.haefliger@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marco.antonio.780@gmail.com \
--cc=tycho@docker.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).