From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Yi Li" Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 06:50:45 +0000 Subject: [Q] Which tree should we work agains? Message-Id: <006601cf8478$52fb3310$f8f19930$@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Hi Dan, I=E2=80=99m a kernel newbie, and sorry for bother you in advanced. >From your this email: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.janitors/= 30739, you have pointed out we should work against linux-next tree. is it true for= all of us? >From this site: https://code.google.com/p/kernel-janitors/, I got this stat= ements: "Q: What version should I be patching against?=20 A: Latest "linus" (2.6.x-rcY from kernel.org). Be sure to check -mm and -kj= trees to see=20 if someone already did that. " For -mm tree, is it means the linux-mm tree? after reading this wiki: http:= //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mm_tree, it seems linux-next is the substitution for linux-mm tree's "new features" = functionality. For the -kj tree, I event can't find it from https://git.kernel.org/cgit we= bsite, only found it at here: http://cba.si/kj/ is it outdated, and un-useful? So, in one word, could you kindly point me out which tree I should work aga= inst ?Or just kindly give me the links for document. Thanks for your help in advanced. regards, Yi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html