From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2010 10:07:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] arch/arm: Use set_cpus_allowed_ptr
Message-Id: <1269857239.12097.250.camel@laptop>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1003262301300.6480@ask.diku.dk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1003262301300.6480@ask.diku.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org

On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 23:01 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> 
> Use set_cpus_allowed_ptr rather than set_cpus_allowed.
> 
> The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression E1,E2;
> @@
> 
> - set_cpus_allowed(E1, cpumask_of_cpu(E2))
> + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E1, cpumask_of(E2))
> 
> @@
> expression E;
> identifier I;
> @@
> 
> - set_cpus_allowed(E, I)
> + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(E, &I)
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>

Thanks for doing this Julia!