From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <martinez.javier@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010 03:19:38 +0000
Subject: Re: Staging: spectra: removes q->prepare_flush_fn
Message-Id: <1278731978.1725.11.camel@lenovo>
List-Id: <kernel-janitors.vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org

>
> Ok, I'll just keep this in my to-apply queue again, and then apply it
> when it is needed for Linus's tree.  Is that ok?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

I found more compile errors (more API changes) with this driver in today
linux-next.

I prepared a patch-set containing the previous patch sent and two more.
This three patches allow spectra driver to compile in today linux-next. 

Do you want me to do it this way (keeping a patchset) or should I send
separate patches as issues arises?

The patchset I will send contains the following patches:

[PATCH 1/3] fix staging/spectra: removes q->prepare_flush_fn
[PATCH 2/3] fix staging/spectra: use new REQ_FLUSH flag
[PATCH 3/3] fix staging/spectra: don't use locked_ioctl

Thanks a lot