From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Woodhouse Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:28:39 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fix staging/spectra: removes q->prepare_flush_fn Message-Id: <1279290519.26249.50.camel@localhost> List-Id: References: <1278732312.1725.17.camel@lenovo> In-Reply-To: <1278732312.1725.17.camel@lenovo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:14 +0100, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/15/10 18:24, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: > >> > >> These 3 patches fix the build errors. > >> There are still some warnings that should be addressed. > >> > >> Thanks. > >> > >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap > >> > >> > > > > Thanks a lot for reviewing the patches. I can address the warnings. > > Should I send patches as a delta of these three patches or do I resend > > a patchset containing these three and the others that will address > > the warnings? > > Greg, which do you prefer? > > I would just send more patches as deltas, but it's up to Greg. > AFAIK, he hasn't applied these 3 yet. Or should I keep a tree for the spectra driver, apply patches to *that* and ask Greg to pull from it? -- David Woodhouse Open Source Technology Centre David.Woodhouse@intel.com Intel Corporation