From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 20:26:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] fix staging/spectra: removes q->prepare_flush_fn Message-Id: <1279398391.14049.5.camel@lenovo> List-Id: References: <1278732312.1725.17.camel@lenovo> In-Reply-To: <1278732312.1725.17.camel@lenovo> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org >>> >>> These 3 patches fix the build errors. >>> There are still some warnings that should be addressed. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap >>> >>> >> >> Thanks a lot for reviewing the patches. I can address the warnings. >> Should I send patches as a delta of these three patches or do I resend >> a patchset containing these three and the others that will address >> the warnings? > > Greg, which do you prefer? > > I would just send more patches as deltas, but it's up to Greg. > AFAIK, he hasn't applied these 3 yet. > I prepared another patchset that removes all the warnings. This patches are= a delta from the previous patchset so it assumes that these three patches = all already applied: [PATCH 1/3] fix staging/spectra: removes q->prepare_flush_fn [PATCH 2/3] fix staging/spectra: use new REQ_FLUSH flag [PATCH 3/3] fix staging/spectra: don't use locked_ioctl The new patchset contains the following patches: [PATCH 1/4] staging/spectra: remove duplicate GLOB_VERSION definition [PATCH 2/4] staging/spectra: remove unused variable [PATCH 3/4] staging/spectra: initializa lblk variable [PATCH 4/4] staging/spectra: remove unused functions Best regards, ----------------------------------------- Javier Mart=C3=ADnez Canillas +595 981 88 66 58 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html