From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 16:53:29 +0000 Subject: Re: coccinelle and bitmask arithmetic Message-Id: <1359564809.32305.23.camel@joe-AO722> List-Id: References: <20130127194039.GA18787@elgon.mountain> <1359317078.14406.12.camel@joe-AO722> <20130127201947.GO16282@mwanda> <9561.1359474916@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <1359475998.4196.26.camel@joe-AO722> <1359482637.15135.7.camel@joe-AO722> <5108D808.6010405@bfs.de> <20130130111420.GG23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130130113533.GI23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20130130113533.GI23505@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr On Wed, 2013-01-30 at 11:35 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:21:21PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > So, _either_ logical OR or addition works. > > > > > > If we _did_ end up with a PHYS_OFFSET with bits less than bit 26 set > > > here, we'd have bigger problems - because the base of RAM in PCI space > > > will not correspond with PHYS_OFFSET and all the DMA mapping stuff breaks. > > > > The "problem" is that the computation is done inconsistently within the > > same file. Sometimes with + and sometimes with |. > > And I say that is not a problem; if it _does_ become a problem, there are > bigger problems that would also need solving, which given a multi-subarch > kernel become a lot lot harder. > > Sure, we can just change them to all be a bitwise OR (sorry, not logical) > but that's really only half the story. As far as I can tell, there'd be a lot of +'s to change in arch/arm and only 2 uses of | in it8152.c $ git grep -P "\(?\s*SZ_\d+[A-Z]\s*-\s*1\s*\)?\s*\|" arch/arm arch/arm/common/it8152.c: *dev->dma_mask = (SZ_64M - 1) | PHYS_OFFSET; arch/arm/common/it8152.c: dev->coherent_dma_mask = (SZ_64M - 1) | PHYS_OFFSET; $ git grep -P "\+\s*\(?\s*SZ_\d+[A-Z]\b\s*-\s*1\s*\)?" arch/arm | wc -l 460 I think consistently using + would make it simpler for some possible future conversion.