From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Berg Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:56:01 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/11] use ether_addr_equal_64bits Message-Id: <1388429761.4410.1.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net> List-Id: References: <1388427307-8691-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> <1388427307-8691-5-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> (sfid-20131230_182319_112673_F481A1D3) In-Reply-To: <1388427307-8691-5-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> (sfid-20131230_182319_112673_F481A1D3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Julia Lawall Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Emmanuel Grumbach , Intel Linux Wireless , "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2013-12-30 at 19:15 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > From: Julia Lawall > > Ether_addr_equal_64bits is more efficient than ether_addr_equal, and can be > used when each argument is an array within a structure that contains at > least two bytes of data beyond the array. > > The structures involved are: > iwl_rxon_cmd defined in drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/dvm/commands.h and > ieee80211_hdr defined in include/linux/ieee80211.h > > This was done using Coccinelle (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/). Seems to be missing an "iwlwifi:" or so prefix, but I guess we can add it when we take the patch ... Is there any way we could catch (sparse, or some other script?) that struct reorganising won't break the condition needed ("within a structure that contains at least two more bytes")? johannes