From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:42:10 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] net-PPP: Replacement of a printk() call by pr_warn() in mppe_rekey() Message-Id: <1417956130.31745.27.camel@perches.com> List-Id: References: <1417731809.2721.17.camel@perches.com> <1417765287.2721.39.camel@perches.com> <1417955413.31745.25.camel@perches.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Julia Lawall Cc: SF Markus Elfring , Sergei Shtylyov , Paul Mackerras , linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2014-12-07 at 13:36 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > the semantic patch is only using __func__ and only in cases where > the string wanted is similar to the name of the current function, so I > think it should be OK? Yes, it'd be a good thing.