From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:53:08 +0000 Subject: Re: IB/core: Fine-tuning for ib_is_udata_cleared() Message-Id: <1471809188.3746.18.camel@perches.com> List-Id: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <1471802623.3746.1.camel@perches.com> <683187e0-2e6a-88c0-f87a-9c5f0489370a@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: <683187e0-2e6a-88c0-f87a-9c5f0489370a-Rn4VEauK+AKRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: SF Markus Elfring , linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Doug Ledford , Hal Rosenstock , Sean Hefty Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Julia Lawall On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 21:51 +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > Don't introduce a defect in patch 1 and correct > > that introduced defect in patch 2. > Which detail do you not like here? See above.