From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
Sven Schmidt <4sschmid@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/lz4: make arrays static const, reduces object code size
Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 01:33:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1506130410.12311.50.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3fyu4gjbiviC93Usaxn=6Ud8YWpiH-va5NTUJwLqDx0g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 23:39 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 9:17 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2017-09-22 at 09:48 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Colin Ian King
> > > > text data bss dec hex filename
> > > > 18220 176 0 18396 47dc build/tmp/lib/lz4/lz4_decompress-after.o
> > > > 22297 0 0 22297 5719 build/tmp/lib/lz4/lz4_decompress-before.o
> > >
> > > Perhaps not so much a gcc bug as an opportunity
> > > for gcc to add an additional optimization.
> > >
> > > gcc would have to verify that the const array is
> > > not initialized with some variable or argument like:
> > >
> > > int foo(int a)
> > > {
> > > const int array[] = {1, a};
> > > ...
> > > }
> >
> > It depends. With a 10KB different in .text size, my guess is that this
> > is a case where gcc does the right optimization in principle, but
> > fails to do what was intended in some corner cases.
>
> I found the problem: "gcc -fsanitze=kernel-address --param asan-stack=1"
> produces lots of expensive checks here with gcc-5 or higher.
>
> Disabling it makes a big difference:
>
> upstream:
> gcc-7.0.0 --fsanitze=kernel-address --param asan-stack=1: 31789 bytes
> gcc-7.0.0: 16535 bytes
>
> patched:
> gcc-7.0.0 --fsanitze=kernel-address --param asan-stack=1: 20351 bytes
> gcc-7.0.0: 14490 bytes
I think you are looking at a different issue.
There seems still a difference in size between
current and Colin's patch in compiled object size.
> Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-23 1:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-21 22:19 [PATCH] lib/lz4: make arrays static const, reduces object code size Colin King
2017-09-21 23:09 ` Christophe JAILLET
2017-09-21 23:11 ` Colin Ian King
2017-09-22 7:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-09-22 17:21 ` Joe Perches
2017-09-22 19:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-09-22 19:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-09-22 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2017-09-22 21:43 ` Colin Ian King
2017-09-23 1:33 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2017-09-23 1:33 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1506130410.12311.50.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=4sschmid@informatik.uni-hamburg.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox