From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Add a warning for log messages that don't end in a new line
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 09:03:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1511773401.32426.21.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711270741190.2369@hadrien>
On Mon, 2017-11-27 at 07:42 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Sun, 26 Nov 2017, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2017-11-26 at 19:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > I just assume that a printk that has no KERN_ is adding a
> > > > newline, which is my understanding of Joe's comment.
> > >
> > > More precisely:
> > >
> > > Any printk without an initial KERN_CONT prepends a newline
> > > if the last printk content char emitted that is not part
> > > of a printk timestamp/header was not a newline.
> >
> > Ah, I misunderstood. I thought it was any printk that has no KERN
> > indicator at all. That I can fix.
>
> Although I guess that in that case the whole exercise is pointless?
> Because every print will at runtime be followed by another print, which
> will add either the newline or a continuation.
Kinda yes and no.
A printk without a newline termination is not emitted
as output until the next printk call.
This can cause issues on quiescent systems as the printk
is not emitted for potentially a very long time.
Also, any thread interleaving can still cause misformatted
output.
and:
All the historical printks without KERN_CONT worked well
until the commit that broke them by requiring KERN_CONT.
But now these consecutive calls to printk which used to be
emitted on on a single line are printed on multiple lines.
The title of the commit is wrong as KERN_CONT was not
necessary before this change.
---
commit 4bcc595ccd80decb4245096e3d1258989c50ed41
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat Oct 8 20:32:40 2016 -0700
printk: reinstate KERN_CONT for printing continuation lines
---
So IMO it's _somewhat_ useful to try to update the printks
without either
KERN_CONT or with a KERN_<LEVEL> but
without a newline.
As the above commit is about a year old, most of the cases
in the code that are actually likely have been fixed by now.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-27 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-26 5:40 [PATCH v2] checkpatch: Add a warning for log messages that don't end in a new line Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-26 5:51 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-26 6:01 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-26 17:38 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-26 22:29 ` Joe Perches
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.20.1711262334370.2111@hadrien>
2017-11-27 1:12 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 6:08 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 9:25 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 9:32 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 9:42 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:07 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:26 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:33 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:41 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:42 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 4:00 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 6:11 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 6:27 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 6:34 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 6:40 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 8:28 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 8:52 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 9:06 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 16:40 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:20 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:28 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:35 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 17:42 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 17:44 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 18:57 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 19:58 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 20:49 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 22:56 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-28 0:15 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-26 16:55 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-26 17:09 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-26 17:47 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-26 18:17 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-26 18:33 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 1:35 ` Joe Perches
2017-11-27 6:40 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 6:42 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 6:53 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2017-11-27 6:57 ` Julia Lawall
2017-11-27 9:03 ` Joe Perches [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1511773401.32426.21.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox