From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Perches Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 00:49:43 +0000 Subject: Re: platform/x86/thinkpad_acpi: Adjustments for four function implementations Message-Id: <1514940583.31497.4.camel@perches.com> List-Id: References: <81459d11-693a-eb51-9173-9c189677f422@users.sourceforge.net> <20171223014033.jx7fzu7uzjfbzyca@khazad-dum.debian.net> <80ae8328-5851-01b0-cb31-474f7baf1686@users.sourceforge.net> <20180103001034.GC24794@fury> In-Reply-To: <20180103001034.GC24794@fury> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Darren Hart , SF Markus Elfring Cc: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , ibm-acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Andy Shevchenko , Henrique de Moraes Holschuh , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2018-01-02 at 16:10 -0800, Darren Hart wrote: > > > Leave those pr_ messages alone, please, [] > Andy and Henrique raised a few reasons why these patches should not be > accepted: > > 1. This is init code (so any space savings is short lived) Not exactly true. The object code itself is short lived, but the string constant of the format is not as it is placed in const and not discarded.