From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Elfring Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 16:17:46 +0000 Subject: Re: [v5] coccinelle: semantic code search for missing put_device() Message-Id: <1691b160-5558-d4c3-afed-5773e115c5aa@web.de> List-Id: References: <1550217319-40418-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@zte.com.cn> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: Masahiro Yamada , Wen Yang , Julia Lawall Cc: Yi Wang , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek , Wen Yang , Nicolas Palix , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cheng Shengyu , cocci@systeme.lip6.fr > Applied to linux-kbuild. A questionable development version was integrated for this SmPL script. https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/= scripts/coccinelle/free/put_device.cocci?id=DA9cfb87a44da61f2403c4312916bef= cb6b6d7e8 https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn/ Now I am curious on how such a source code analysis approach will be improved further. Which changes will get the desired acceptance? https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1053979/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1553321671-27749-1-git-send-email-wen.yang99@z= te.com.cn/ https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-March/005679.html Regards, Markus