* [PATCH 3/11] arch/x86/kernel: Correct NULL test
@ 2010-02-06 8:42 Julia Lawall
2010-02-06 22:07 ` Ludovic FERRE
2010-02-08 14:18 ` Joerg Roedel
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2010-02-06 8:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86,
iommu, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
dev was tested just above, so drop the second test.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@r@
expression *x;
expression e;
identifier l;
@@
if (x = NULL || ...) {
... when forall
return ...; }
... when != goto l;
when != x = e
when != &x
*x = NULL
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
index adb0ba0..2c4a501 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static bool check_device(struct device *dev)
return false;
/* No device or no PCI device */
- if (!dev || dev->bus != &pci_bus_type)
+ if (dev->bus != &pci_bus_type)
return false;
devid = get_device_id(dev);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/11] arch/x86/kernel: Correct NULL test
2010-02-06 8:42 [PATCH 3/11] arch/x86/kernel: Correct NULL test Julia Lawall
@ 2010-02-06 22:07 ` Ludovic FERRE
2010-02-08 14:18 ` Joerg Roedel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic FERRE @ 2010-02-06 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall
Cc: Joerg Roedel, Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86,
iommu, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Hello Julia,
May be it would be worthy to take your changes one step further and to
report if the function is called with a null device pointer (which
indicates a problem in the calling code, right?).
Here's a patch moving the null pointer check to its own if block and
reporting the null pointer function call using printk based on
2.6.33-rc6 code.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
index 23824fe..1a1d87c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
@@ -114,11 +114,17 @@ static bool check_device(struct device *dev)
{
u16 devid;
- if (!dev || !dev->dma_mask)
+ /* Function is called with a null pointer. Flag this and return false */
+ if (!dev){
+ printk(KERN_INFO "amd_iommu check_device called with a
null pointer device\n");
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ if (!dev->dma_mask)
return false;
/* No device or no PCI device */
- if (!dev || dev->bus != &pci_bus_type)
+ if (dev->bus != &pci_bus_type)
return false;
devid = get_device_id(dev);
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> dev was tested just above, so drop the second test.
>
> A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
> follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @r@
> expression *x;
> expression e;
> identifier l;
> @@
>
> if (x = NULL || ...) {
> ... when forall
> return ...; }
> ... when != goto l;
> when != x = e
> when != &x
> *x = NULL
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
> index adb0ba0..2c4a501 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/amd_iommu.c
> @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static bool check_device(struct device *dev)
> return false;
>
> /* No device or no PCI device */
> - if (!dev || dev->bus != &pci_bus_type)
> + if (dev->bus != &pci_bus_type)
> return false;
>
> devid = get_device_id(dev);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
Ludovic
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/11] arch/x86/kernel: Correct NULL test
2010-02-06 8:42 [PATCH 3/11] arch/x86/kernel: Correct NULL test Julia Lawall
2010-02-06 22:07 ` Ludovic FERRE
@ 2010-02-08 14:18 ` Joerg Roedel
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joerg Roedel @ 2010-02-08 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall
Cc: Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, H. Peter Anvin, x86, iommu,
linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 09:42:39AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> dev was tested just above, so drop the second test.
Applied to amd-iommu/fixes. Thanks Julia.
Joerg
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-08 14:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-06 8:42 [PATCH 3/11] arch/x86/kernel: Correct NULL test Julia Lawall
2010-02-06 22:07 ` Ludovic FERRE
2010-02-08 14:18 ` Joerg Roedel
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).