From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: check capabilities in open()
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:07:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100724160701.GA4907@albatros> (raw)
Hi,
I've found that some drivers check process capabilities via capable() in
open(), not in ioctl()/write()/etc.
I cannot find answer in POSIX, but IMO process expects that file
descriptors of priviledged user and file descriptors of the same
file/device are the same in priviledge aspect. Driver should deny/allow
open() and deny/allow ioctl() based on user priviledges. The path how
the process gained this fd doesn't matter.
So I think these 2 examples should be equal:
1) root process opened the file and then dropped its priviledges
2) nonroot process opened the file
Currently gained fds are different in priviledge aspect.
If you think these are bugs, I can move capable() checking down to
ioctl()/write()/read()/etc.
This is the full list of such drivers:
drivers/staging/comedi/comedi_fops.c
drivers/oprofile/event_buffer.c
drivers/s390/char/vmcp.c
drivers/s390/char/zcore.c
drivers/net/ppp_generic.c
drivers/scsi/3w-sas.c
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.c
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c
drivers/char/mem.c
drivers/char/tty_io.c
drivers/char/agp/frontend.c
drivers/char/apm-emulation.c
This is coccinelle script to find that:
@ r1 @
identifier fops;
identifier openx;
@@
struct file_operations fops = {
...
.open = openx,
...
};
@@
identifier r1.openx;
@@
openx(...)
{
...
*capable(...)
...
}
next reply other threads:[~2010-07-24 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-24 16:07 Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2010-07-24 18:23 ` check capabilities in open() Al Viro
2010-07-25 5:45 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-07-25 9:23 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-07-26 11:23 ` Ted Ts'o
2010-07-26 16:52 ` Vasiliy Kulikov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100724160701.GA4907@albatros \
--to=segooon@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox