public inbox for kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@gmail.com>
To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: check capabilities in open()
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2010 16:07:01 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100724160701.GA4907@albatros> (raw)

Hi,

I've found that some drivers check process capabilities via capable() in
open(), not in ioctl()/write()/etc.

I cannot find answer in POSIX, but IMO process expects that file
descriptors of priviledged user and file descriptors of the same
file/device are the same in priviledge aspect. Driver should deny/allow
open() and deny/allow ioctl() based on user priviledges. The path how
the process gained this fd doesn't matter.

So I think these 2 examples should be equal:

1) root process opened the file and then dropped its priviledges

2) nonroot process opened the file

Currently gained fds are different in priviledge aspect.


If you think these are bugs, I can move capable() checking down to
ioctl()/write()/read()/etc.



This is the full list of such drivers:

drivers/staging/comedi/comedi_fops.c
drivers/oprofile/event_buffer.c
drivers/s390/char/vmcp.c
drivers/s390/char/zcore.c
drivers/net/ppp_generic.c
drivers/scsi/3w-sas.c
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
drivers/scsi/megaraid.c
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas.c
drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_mm.c
drivers/char/mem.c
drivers/char/tty_io.c
drivers/char/agp/frontend.c
drivers/char/apm-emulation.c


This is coccinelle script to find that:

@ r1 @
identifier fops;
identifier openx;
@@

struct file_operations fops = {
...
.open       = openx,
...
};


@@
identifier r1.openx;
@@

openx(...)
{
...
*capable(...)
...
}

             reply	other threads:[~2010-07-24 16:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-24 16:07 Vasiliy Kulikov [this message]
2010-07-24 18:23 ` check capabilities in open() Al Viro
2010-07-25  5:45   ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-07-25  9:23     ` Vasiliy Kulikov
2010-07-26 11:23     ` Ted Ts'o
2010-07-26 16:52       ` Vasiliy Kulikov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100724160701.GA4907@albatros \
    --to=segooon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox