From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:20:31 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] oss: msnd: check request_region() return value Message-Id: <20100728212031.GQ26313@bicker> List-Id: References: <1280335296-23475-1-git-send-email-segooon@gmail.com> <20100728200002.GP26313@bicker> In-Reply-To: <20100728200002.GP26313@bicker> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Kulikov Vasiliy , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Veliath , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Arnd Bergmann , Tejun Heo , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:00:02PM +0200, Dan Carpenter wrote: > This should be -EBUSY as well. The same for "[PATCH 06/10] ALSA: msnd: > check request_region() return value" > > Another way to write that would be: > Gar. I was thinking of request_resource(). request_region() returns a pointer of course. But still the return code should probably be -EBUSY. Resource conflicts are more likely than allocation failures. regards, dan carpenter > - request_region(dev.io, dev.numio, dev.name); > + err = request_region(dev.io, dev.numio, dev.name); > + if (err) { > + free_irq(dev.irq, &dev); > + return err; > + } > > regards, > dan carpenter > > > + if (request_region(dev.io, dev.numio, dev.name) = NULL) { > > + free_irq(dev.irq, &dev); > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + }